Members of the Board of Examiners (members) for the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award® pledge to uphold their professional principles in the fulfillment of their responsibilities as defined in the administration of Public Law 100-107, the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Improvement Act of 1987. The Board of Examiners Code of Ethical Conduct establishes accountability for these principles. Four principles are the foundation of the Code of Ethical Conduct. These principles are intended to protect the interests of all key stakeholders, including applicants, examiners, judges, and the program, creating a safe and empowering environment for all to engage, share, learn, and improve. Known violations should be reported as soon as practical to the Baldrige Program Director, who will not release the source of the information without permission.
Members will make sound decisions related to conflicting or competing interests, as well as do their part to ensure that all organizations are evaluated consistently for the Baldrige Award and other Baldrige assessments. Violations of this principle include, but are not limited to, the following examples:
Members will conduct themselves professionally, guided by truth, accuracy, fairness, respect, thoughtfulness, and responsibility in all their interactions. Violations of this principle include, but are not limited to, the following examples:
Members will safeguard the confidences of all parties involved in the judging or examination of present or former applicants so that the integrity of the Baldrige Award or award process is not compromised. Violations of this principle include, but are not limited to, the following examples:
Disclosing the identity of or other information about the applicant to anyone other than the examiner’s team, the judge involved in the examination, or the Baldrige staff members involved in the examination during or at any time after the review process.
Copying applicant information of any kind. Note: Copying information from inside the Baldrige Program’s encrypted, secure database to other documents within the database is permitted as necessary.
Retaining applicant information beyond the Virtual Evaluation (or Site Visit Review, if applicable)
Communicating applicant identity or other applicant information through email, social media, or any other electronic or written means outside of the Baldrige Program’s secure database
Communicating applicant identity or other information via cell phone, VOIP, or wireless devices unless authorized by the applicant
Using or adapting applicant information subsequent to the review process, unless the information is publicly released by the applicant
Communicating with the applicant during any part of the evaluation, unless the examiner is assigned to do so
Communicating directly with the applicant during site visits about matters other than verifying and clarifying information in the virtual evaluation scorebook, unless the examiner is the team leader or backup team leader
Requesting/reviewing individual customer, stakeholder, or workforce member data and information during the Site Visit Review process. This includes web links that the applicant may have in the application.
Members will make sound decisions related to the use of Baldrige Program materials, trademarks, logos, and information contained within the program’s website. Violations of this principle include, but are not limited to, the following examples:
Furthermore, board members have a responsibility to enhance and advance the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award® as it serves to stimulate U.S. organizations to improve overall performance. All board members pledge to abide by this Code of Ethical Conduct.
Rev. 12/2024
Baldrige Examiners will be required to agree to the Code of Conduct in the examiner application.