Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.


The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Robotics in manufacturing


Robot arm picks up a red widget off a table
Credit: R. Wilson/NIST

When you pick up one pencil from a pile on a table, how does your hand know where to go or what to grab? Your eyes help out.

For robots to do the same, they need their own way to see the object that they want to pick up or put down. It takes perception, specifically a sensor-based system that can accurately identify – sometimes to within a millimeter or less – an object’s position, orientation and dimensions.

Currently, robots on a factory line require special, time-consuming and expensive accommodations to function. A product’s parts need to be held at just the right height and just the right angle so that the preprogrammed robots can get the job done. If that job changes, manufacturers need to reprogram the robot’s movements and build an entirely new set of fixtures to position the parts all over again.

Just as your eyes would help with that pencil, 3D perception systems let robots switch from one task to the next, identify specific parts and pick them up.

But just as no two eyes are exactly the same, no two manufacturers’ robot sensors perform the exact same way. Sensors respond differently to variations in light, how shiny an object is, the shape of an object, etc. Right now, there are very few ways to compare a 3D sensor’s performance from one company to another.

That’s the space that NIST engineers are entering right now. We’re developing standards for robot perception systems and testing their capabilities against measurements from highly accurate instruments.

And we’re looking for friends in the field. Developing standards depends on a community of experts and users reaching consensus. If you’re interested in this topic or know someone who is, please spread the word and get in touch with our researchers.

Follow us on social media for more like this from all across NIST!

News and Updates

Industry Impacts

Human-Robot Collaboration

The use of robots in factories is limited by the robots’ ability to safely collaborate with one another and with human workers. NIST’s technical leadership

Projects and Programs

Emergency Response Robots

Emergency responders risk life and limb interacting with known hazards to protect the public, rescue potential victims, and enhance the resilience of


Benchmarking Protocols for Evaluating Small Parts Robotic Assembly Systems

Kenneth E. Kimble, Joseph A. Falco, Elena R. Messina, Karl Van Wyk , Yu Sun, Mizuho Shibata, Wataru Uemura, Yasuyoshi Yokokohji
This paper presents a set of performance metrics, test methods, and associated artifacts to help progress the development and deployment of robotic assembly

Tools and Instruments

Manufacturing Robotics Testbed

The NIST manufacturing robotics test bed consists of several labs located in three buildings on the main NIST campus. Combined, these serve as a resource for

Robotics Test Facility

Located on the NIST Gaithersburg campus, the Robotics Test Facility – also known as Building 207 – is a laboratory for developing standard methods of measuring



Through the USARSim and MOAST open source projects, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is promoting performance...

SME Fellow

Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) 2009 Fellow