Knowledge of a material’s mechanical properties is key to designing safe and reliable structural components for applications ranging in size from medical implants to large civil engineering structures. Traditionally, a material’s mechanical properties are measured by performing mechanical tests on specimens from a few millimeters to many meters in length, with test equipment of corresponding sizes.
Scaling specimen sizes down to the millimeter (mesoscale) or the micrometer scale is beneficial for many applications, but also presents new challenges. Numerous industries utilize structural components or have critical features that are smaller than can be evaluated using conventionally sized approaches. For example, the strength of welds and solder joints are strongly tied to the micrometer-scale spatial variation of the alloys’ microstructure and composition. Measuring the local properties at different mesoscale regions of these structures will provide more complete understanding of their behavior and improve manufacturing reliability. This is especially pertinent to the electronics manufacturing industry where lead-based solders have been replaced by newer solder alloys whose properties are still not as well understood. Other applications involve testing of specimens comparable in size to small load-bearing components such as the mechanical parts in electronics packages, medical implants, and Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) devices, to obtain more accurate properties.
Small specimens are also highly conducive to in-situ testing in harsh environments such as extreme temperatures (hot or cold), exposure to corrosive chemicals or exposure to radiation. Mesoscale specimens allow for safer in-situ environmental tests, and allow more tests to be performed when the volume of material may be limited, such as materials from in-service components. Testing of mesoscale specimens can therefore help accelerate the development of advanced structural materials for applications ranging from nuclear reactors to space satellites.
Traditionally, efforts to scale down the size of bulk material tests have met with several challenges. Apart from the challenge of fabricating micro and mesoscale specimens, as specimens become smaller than a millimeter it becomes increasingly difficult to handle and grip them, and to apply and measure the loads and displacements. Traditional testing methods do not provide the required level of accuracy and resolution when they are significantly larger than the specimens.
Our goal is to develop new test methods and instruments for measuring time-dependent mechanical properties of micro to mesoscale bulk materials. Our approaches include adapting conventional test methods, as well as developing new table-top test instruments and chip-scale MEMS-based test instruments [https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/microsystems-harsh-environment-testing]. Our MEMS-based test techniques have so far demonstrated tests to fracture of among the smallest size specimens (gauge sections) of bulk – not thin film - materials reported in the literature. This capability positions us well for tackling additional challenges such as dynamic testing of micro and mesoscale specimens at high strain rates. Manufacturing applications such as micro metal forming, extrusion and additive manufacturing involve large material deformations at high strain rates. In defense applications, structural components such as armor, ballistics, drones, sensors, electronics and munitions contain small components subjected to high accelerations and impacts. For applications such as these, micro and mesoscale material data at high strain rates is needed for accurate finite element modeling. However, a gap currently exists in the literature on test methods for these sizes and strain rates, as shown in the figure below. Our test approaches could potentially fill this gap.
We are currently working with the U.S. Army Armament Research Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC) Fuze Division and HT Micro Analytical Inc (Albuquerque, NM) under a Joint Fuze Technology Program (JFTP) funded effort to characterize the dynamic response of microscale nickel alloys for structural analysis codes. ARDEC engineers develop micro mechanical mechanisms fabricated through the LIGA process (Lithographie, Galvanoformung, Abformung) for various applications. It is well known that the properties of materials at the microscale differ from those at the macroscale. To determine formal design margins for these mechanisms, the microscale material’s dynamic response under various loading conditions needs to be understood. NIST is developing test methods and specimen designs to perform tensile, shear and compressive tests at various strain rates and temperatures, and using these test methods to characterize the dynamic behavior of the microscale metal materials. Another objective is to provide test data that is statistically significant and with well-understood experimental uncertainties. The results of this effort will enable engineers to increase the reliability of the micro mechanisms and to understand and recreate device failures using finite element analysis, and will also be broadly applicable to many other applications involving the design and reliability of Micro Electro Mechanical Systems and highly miniaturized structural components.
 J. Lee, K. Asim, J. Pan, “Failure mechanism of laser welds in lap-shear specimens of high strength low alloy steel,” J. Pressure Vessel Tech. 134(6), 061402, 2012
 S.K. Kang, P. Lauro, D.-Y. Shih, D.W. Henderson, J. Bartelo, T. Gosselin, S.R. Cain, C. Goldsmith, K. Puttlitz, T.K. Hwang, W.K. Choi, “The microstructure, thermal fatigue, and failure analysis of near-ternary eutectic Sn-Ag-Cu solder joints,” Mat. Trans., Vol 45, no. 3, pp. 695-702, 2004.
 J.S. Kim and H. Huh, “Evaluation of the Material Properties of an OFHC Copper Film at High Strain Rates Using a Micro-Testing Machine,” Exp Mech, 2011.
 L.A. Liew, D.T. Read, and N. Barbosa III, “US Army ARDEC Joint Fuze Technology Program (JFTP), Microscale Materials and Energetic Effects Characterization, Task 2 Report: Quasi-Static Tensile Tests,” NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NIST IR) – 8182, 2018.
structural materials, mechanical testing, materials characterization, energy, infrastructure, electronics, manufacturing, microscale, MEMS, microsystems