Skip to main content

NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.

Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR)

XML Schema Validation Process for CORE.GOV

Author(s)
KC Morris, Boonserm Kulvatunyou, Simon P. Frechette, Joshua Lubell, Puja Goyal
Many integration projects today rely on shared semantic models based on standards represented using Extensible Mark up Language (XML) technologies. Shared

Information Models for Product Representation: Core and Assembly Models

Author(s)
Sudarsan Rachuri, Mehmet M. Baysal, Utpal Roy, Sebti Foufou, Steven J. Fenves, Eswaran Subrahmanian, Kevin W. Lyons, Ram D. Sriram, Conrad Bock
This report presents a revised and unified view of the NIST Core Product Model (CPM) [1; 2] and the NIST Open Assembly Model (OAM) [3]. The CPM provides a base

XML Schema Design Quality Test Requirements

Author(s)
Boonserm Kulvatunyou, KC Morris
Consistent design of XML schema within an organization or single integration project can reduce the number and the severity of interoperability problems. In

3rd Annual PKI R&D Workshop Proceedings

Author(s)
K I. Sankar, William Polk, Nelson Hastings
NIST hosted the third annual Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Research Workshop on April 12-14, 2004. The two and a half day event brought together PKI experts

Applications of PSL to Semantic Web Services

Author(s)
Michael Gruninger
In this paper we will show how the ontology of the Process Specification Language can be used as an upper-level process ontology that serves as the semantic
Was this page helpful?