Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


The Official Baldrige Blog

magazine reader

My title probably has you thinking about some life-changing transition or a big vacation to refresh or, maybe, a new exercise regimen. If that is the case, I am sorry to disappoint you.

This blog post is about those renewal reminders for annual donations you make to a charity or for renewal of a magazine subscription. The reminders usually start with "Thanks for your donation last year," or "Don't miss a single issue," or "Immediate action needed." The most recent one I received was a little more subtle, it said "Your membership is in the expiration window."  Of course, they did not tell me how wide the window is! The common characteristic among these reminders is that they almost always start arriving way before the actual anniversary date, but you would never know it from the wording in the mailing you receive.

There is a story on the Minnesota Attorney General's web site about a woman who after several early renewal notices, received a notice that her subscription would be suspended and her account sent to collections if she did not make a payment. She still had six months on her current subscription. Some states require magazines to disclose the expiration date on renewal notices, but not my state.

It gets me angry, each time I receive one of these reminders, because I then have to check when the actual expiration date is. In the case of a charity, even if I were inclined to make an additional donation, the tactic makes me reconsider. Furthermore, I do not appreciate that my charitable giving is being used for these mailings rather than charitable purposes. And, with my magazine subscriptions, I keep thinking how my multiple subscription reminders are adding to the cost of my subscription. 

Of course, I do have the ultimate control; I can choose to not renew. But my donation is driven by the mission of the charity and my subscription by a magazine I want to read. I must admit there is one charity where the reminders were so frequent, that I sent them a note and have not given to them since then. But it pains me that was the final outcome, because I did truly identify with their mission.

So why does this practice continue? Because there are enough people, I assume, who do respond to these announcements. And in the case of charities it can be a spiral of short renewal cycles, because once you donate the clock starts over for their reminders.

The end result for the customer is to keep a list of renewal and charitable giving dates, which then needs to be checked with each reminder. As expected, that does not build a positive relationship.

Every time I get one of these reminders, I think of several questions in the Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence. The first question is "How do you promote and ensure ethical behavior in all interactions?" Are these early solicitations and the way they are worded really ethical? The second question is "How do you build and manage customer relationships?" The third question is "How do you manage relationships with customers to increase their engagement with you?" I know how I feel as a customer!

On the other hand, there is one more Criteria question to consider, "How do senior leaders in setting expectations for organizational performance, include a focus on creating and balancing value for customers and other stakeholders?"  For charitable donations, while upsetting us donors, are the senior leaders serving a greater good of more charitable dollars available for the beneficiaries? For magazines, I have less sympathy with the interests of non-customer stakeholders.

The challenge for leaders of these organizations is balancing ethical considerations with the needs of all stakeholders. Where do you draw the line?

About the author

Harry Hertz “The Baldrige Cheermudgeon”

I am Harry Hertz, the Baldrige Cheermudgeon, and Director Emeritus of the Baldrige Program. I joined the Program in 1992 after a decade in management in the analytical chemistry and chemical sciences laboratories at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the home of the Baldrige Program. I started my career at NIST (NBS) as a bench analytical chemist.

My favorite aspects of the Baldrige Program are: (1) the opportunity to interact with leading thinkers from all sectors of the U.S. economy who serve as volunteers in the Baldrige Program, who participate in the Baldrige Executive Fellows Program, and who represent Award applicants at the forefront of the continuous journey to performance excellence, and (2) the intellectual challenge of synthesizing ideas from leading thinkers and from personal research into Insights on the Road to Performance Excellence and other blogs that tackle challenges at the “leading edge of validated leadership and performance practice,” and contribute to the continuous revision of the Baldrige Performance Excellence Framework.

Outside of work I spend my time with family (including three beautiful granddaughters), exercising, baking bread, traveling, educating tomorrow’s leaders, and participating on various boards and board committees.

Related posts


Harry, you have voiced one of my pet peeves as well, and have motivated me to stop being passive and challenge those organizations that bill me long before my renewal is due. Mahalo!

Add new comment

Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Please be respectful when posting comments. We will post all comments without editing as long as they are appropriate for a public, family friendly website, are on topic and do not contain profanity, personal attacks, misleading or false information/accusations or promote specific commercial products, services or organizations. Comments that violate our comment policy or include links to non-government organizations/web pages will not be posted.