NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
A Comparison of Thickness Values for Very Thin SiO2 Films by Using Ellipsometric, Capacitance-Voltage and HRTEM Measurements
Published
Author(s)
James R. Ehrstein, Curt A. Richter, Deane Chandler-Horowitz, Eric M. Vogel, Chadwin Young, Shweta Shah, Dennis Maher, Brendan C. Foran, Alain C. Diebold
Abstract
Abstract. A comparison study of very thin SiO2 film thickness values obtained from the three dominant measure-ment techniques used in the Integrated Circuit industry: ellipsometry, capacitance-voltage (C-V) measurements and transmission electron microscopy has been completed. This work is directed at evaluating the metrology capabilities that might support the development and certification of Reference Materials for very thin dielectric films. Particular care was taken in the design of the sample set to allow redundancy and enable estimates of oxide layer consistency. We used a variety of models of the film structure to analyze ellipsometry measurements, and used three different quantum-mechanical based algorithms to account for quantized states in the substrate and depletion effects in the polysilicon capacitor-electrode to analyze the C-V results. TEM measurements of two capacitor cross-sections were conducted by both phase contrast high resolution (HRTEM) and atomic number (Z) contrast high-angle annular darkfield scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). We found a range of thickness values with each of the methods, but there was an overlap of values among the three techniques. HRTEM and STEM values showed less consistency between wafers than did the C-V data for the capacitors used, and seemed to be influenced more by lo-cal variations such as interface non-uniformities. We present sources of variation and estimates of the primary com-ponents of uncertainty for the measurements employed and discuss the implications of these results for obtaining consistent and unified film thickness metrology and for possible reference standards
Citation
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
Volume
153
Issue
1
Pub Type
Journals
Keywords
gate dielectrics, reference materials, silicon dioxide, thin film metrology
Citation
Ehrstein, J.
, Richter, C.
, Chandler-Horowitz, D.
, Vogel, E.
, Young, C.
, Shah, S.
, Maher, D.
, Foran, B.
and Diebold, A.
(2006),
A Comparison of Thickness Values for Very Thin SiO2 Films by Using Ellipsometric, Capacitance-Voltage and HRTEM Measurements, Journal of the Electrochemical Society
(Accessed October 12, 2025)