The Friction Ridge Subcommittee focuses on standards and guidelines related to the forensic examination of friction ridge detail from the hands and feet.
Officers | Members | Standards | Other Work Products
Heidi Eldridge, Subcommittee Chair, George Washington University
Joshua Connelly, Subcommittee Vice Chair, Douglas County Sheriff's Office
Andrew Pacejka, Subcommittee Executive Secretary, Utah Bureau of Forensic Services
Brianne Breedlove, Uncover Forensics
Simon Cole, Ph.D., University of California
Jack Flanders, Texas Department of Public Safety Crime Laboratory
Kalisha Gill, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory (USACIL)
Nova Grilli, Charleston Police Department
Richard Gutierrez, Law Office of the Cook County Public Defender (Legal Task Group representative)
Sharon Kelley, University of Virginia (Human Factors Task Group representative)
Louis Kriel, Georgia Bureau of Investigation
Amanda Luby, Assistant Professor of Statistics Carleton College (Statistics Task Group representative)
Delilah Ortiz-Meyer, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory (USACIL) (Quality Task Group Representative)
Michelle Machalka, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Elizabeth Molina, Dallas Police Department
Eric Ray, IDEMIA
Norberto Rivera, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Jim Snaidauf, IRS - Criminal Investigations National Forensic Laboratory
AshLee Taylor, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Christie VanAndel, Nebraska State Patrol
Friction Ridge Affiliate List
- ANSI/ASB Best Practice Recommendation 142, Best Practice Recommendations for the Resolution of Conflicts in Friction Ridge Examination. 2022. 1st. Ed. (added February 6, 2024).
- ANSI/ASB Standard 145, Standard for Consultation during Friction Ridge Examination. 2023. 1st. Ed. (added July 2, 2024).
- ANSI/ASTM E3235-21, Standard Practice for Latent Print Evidence Imaging Resolution (NOTE: This document was drafted by OSAC's Video/Imaging Technology & Analysis Subcommittee and added to the Registry June 7, 2022).
- OSAC 2021-N-0020, Best Practice Recommendations for Limited Examinations (added April 5, 2022 and sent to ASB for further development and publication).
- OSAC 2022-S-0012, Standard for Proficiency Testing in Friction Ridge Examinations (added June 7, 2022 and sent to ASB for further development and publication).
- OSAC 2022-N-0033, Standard for Processing Evidence for the Detection of Friction Ridge Impressions (added September 6, 2022 and sent to ASB for further development and publication).
- OSAC 2022-S-0038, Standard for Feature Selection in Friction Ridge Examination (added September 5, 2023).
Published by a Standards Developing Organization (SDO) & Eligible for the OSAC Registry
- ANSI/ASB Standard 014, Standard for Friction Ridge Examination Training Program. 2024. 1st Ed.
- ANSI/ASB Standard 015, Standard for Examining Friction Ridge Impressions, 2024. 1st Ed.
- ANSI/ASB Best Practice Recommendation 142, Best Practice Recommendations for the Resolution of Conflicts in Friction Ridge Examination. 2022. 1st. Ed.
- ANSI/ASB Standard 143, Standard for Technical Review in Friction Ridge Examination. 2024. 1st Ed.
- ANSI/ASB Best Practice Recommendation 144, Addendum-2024, Addendum to Best Practice Recommendations for the Verification Component in Friction Ridge Examination. 2022. 1st. Ed.
- ANSI/ASB Best Practice Recommendation 165, Best Practice Recommendation for Analysis of Friction Ridge Impressions. 2024. 1st Ed.
- ANSI/ASB Best Practice Recommendation 166, Best Practice Recommendation for Comparison and Evaluation of Friction Ridge Impressions. 2024. 1st Ed.
- ANSI/ASB Standard 167, Standard for Reporting Written Results from Friction Ridge Examinations. 2024. 1st Ed.
- ANSI/ASB Standard 168, Standard for Testimony Monitoring in Friction Ridge Examination. 2024.1st Ed.
At an SDO for Further Development & Publication
All documents listed below are completed work products of the OSAC Friction Ridge Subcommittee and have passed a rigorous technical and quality review by the subcommittee. The subcommittee encourages the forensic science community to implement these proposed standards.
- OSAC 2021-N-0020, Best Practice Recommendations for Limited Examinations (OSAC Proposed Standard on the Registry).
- OSAC 2022-S-0012, Standard for Proficiency Testing in Friction Ridge Examinations (OSAC Proposed Standard on the Registry).
- OSAC 2022-N-0033, Standard for Processing Evidence for the Detection of Friction Ridge Impressions (OSAC Proposed Standard on the Registry).
- OSAC 2022-S-0038, Standard for Feature Selection in Friction Ridge Examination (OSAC Proposed Standard on the Registry).
- Best Practice Recommendation for the Resolution of Conflicts in Friction Ridge Examination (as of January 17, 2023, the Friction Ridge Subcommittee is evaluating the published version of this document, ANSI/ASB 142, for placement on the OSAC Registry).
- Best Practice Recommendations for the Verification Component in Friction Ridge Examination (as of January 17, 2023, the Friction Ridge Subcommittee is evaluating the published version of this document, ANSI/ASB 144, for placement on the OSAC Registry).
- Best Practice Recommendation for Articulating a Source Identification in Friction Ridge Examination.
- Standard for Friction Ridge Examination Conclusions.
- Standard for Friction Ridge Examination Training Program.
- Standard for Examining Friction Ridge Impressions.
- Best Practice Recommendations for Technical Review in Friction Ridge Identification.
- Standard for Consultation During Friction Ridge Examination (as of August 1, 2023, the Friction Ridge Subcommittee is evaluating the published version of this document ANSI/ASB 145, for placement on the OSAC Registry).
- Best Practice Recommendation for Analysis of Friction Ridge Impressions.
- Best Practice Recommendation for Comparison and Evaluation of Friction Ridge Impressions.
- Standard for Reporting Results from Friction Ridge Examinations.
- Best Practice Recommendation for Testimony Monitoring.
Under Development
- OSAC 2023-N-0012, Best Practice Recommendations for the Acceptance of a Request for Friction Ridge Examinations.
- OSAC 2023-S-0026, Task-Relevant Information in Friction Ridge Examinations.
- Detection of Friction Ridge Impressions.
- Automated Biometric Identification Systems (ABIS) Best Practices.
- Method Validation.
- Performance Checks.
- Recruiting/Selection Requirements (for pattern recognition disciplines).
Process Maps
Reference Documents
Research & Development Needs
Standards Development Maps
Webinars, Presentations & Training Videos
- *NEW* Implementing Friction Ridge Registry Standards, International Association for Identification (IAI) Conference, August 2024.
- Development of Standards and Best Practice Recommendations for Friction Ridge Evidence: Update from the OSAC Friction Ridge SC and ASB Friction Ridge Consensus Body, IAI Conference, August 2024.
- Standards Development Activities Related to Friction Ridge Examination, American Academy of Forensic Sciences Annual Conference, February 2024.
- Friction Ridge Subcommittee Updates, IAI Conference, August 2021.
- Friction Ridge Subcommittee, SAC Physics/Pattern Updates, IAI Conference, August 2019.
- OSAC Friction Ridge Subcommittee at OFIA-TPS Conference, May 30, 2019.
- Friction Ridge Subcommittee, SAC Physics/Pattern Update, Habeas Assistance and Training Counsel Project, Eighth National Seminar on Forensic Evidence and the Criminal Law “Fingerprint Evidence", April 27, 2019.
- OSAC Friction Ridge Subcommittee, IAI Conference, August 2018.
Discipline-Specific Bibliographies and Bibliographic References
These documents may contain information to help forensic scientists, judges, lawyers, researchers, and other readers better understand the nature, scope, and foundations of the individual disciplines as currently practiced. The identification of these documents does not represent an endorsement by OSAC or NIST. Only standards that are posted on the OSAC Registry and Technical Guidance documents, are endorsed by OSAC. The referenced documents may be subject to copyright. Note: Subcommittee position statements or responses to data collections by the subcommittee do not necessarily represent the position of OSAC or NIST.