Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

NIST Technical Note 1603

Experimental Study of the Effects of Fuel Type, Fuel Distributions, and Vent Size on Full-Scale Underventilate Compartment Fires in an ISA 9705 Room

FScompartmentFireThis report describes new full-scale compartment fire experiments, which include local measurements of temperature, heat flux and species composition, and global measurements of heat release rate and mass burning rate. The measurements are unique to the compartment fire literature. By design, the experiments provided a comprehensive and quantitative assessment of major and minor carbonaceous gaseous species and soot at two locations in the upper layer of fire in a full scale ISO 9705 room [1].

Fire protection engineers, fire researchers, regulatory authorities, fire service and law enforcement personnel use fire models (such as the NIST Fire Dynamics Simulator, FDS [2]) for design and analysis of fire safety features in buildings and for post-fire reconstruction and forensic applications. Fire field models have historically showed limited ability to accurately and reliably predict the thermal conditions and chemical species in underventilated compartment fires. Formal validation efforts have shown that for well ventilated compartment fires, with the exception perhaps of soot, field models do quite well in predicting temperature and species when experimental uncertainty is accounted for. Inaccurate predictions of incomplete burning and soot levels impact calculations of radiative heat transfer, burning rates, and estimates of human tenability. High-quality (relatively low, quantified uncertainty) measurements of fire gas species, temperature, and soot from the interior of underventilated compartment fires are needed to guide the development and validation of improved fire field models.

The experimental results provided in this report are the continuation of a long-term National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) project to generate the data necessary to test our understanding of fire phenomena in enclosures and to guide the development and validation of field models by providing high quality experimental data. The experimental plan was designed in cooperation with developers of the NIST FDS model to assure that the measurements would be of maximum value. Advanced development of FDS and other field models is extremely important, since it will lead to improved accuracy in the prediction of underventilated burning, typical of fire conditions that occur in structures. Improving models for under-ventilated burning will foster improved prediction of important life safety and fire dynamic phenomena, including fire spread, backdraft, flashover, and egress (involving the presence of toxic gas and smoke), which are critically important for application of fire models for fire safety.

1. ISO9705, Fire Tests - Full-Scale Room Test for Surface Products First Edition. 1993, International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland
2. McGrattan, K.B., et al., Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5): Technical Reference Guide. 2007, National Institute of Standards and Technology 

  Final Report

NIST Technical Note 1603 - "Experimental Study of the Effects of Fuel Type, Fuel Distribution, and Vent Size on Full-Scale Underventilated Compartment Fires in an ISO 9705 Room", September 2008

Data

Data for the tests are available here in comma-separated spreadsheet files (.csv).

(Explanation of Data channel names)

Test ID Fuel Fuel Quant (L/kg) # of Burners Burner size (m²) Doorway (fraction of 80cm) Under-ventilated Duration (min)
ISONG1

Natural Gas

pool fed 1 1 1 N 37
ISONG2 Natural Gas pool fed 1 1 1 N 33
ISONG3 Natural Gas pool fed 1 1 1 N 70
ISOHept4 Heptane pool fed 1 1 1 N 65
ISOHept5 Heptane pool fed 1 1 1 N 75
ISOHept8 Heptane 15 1 0.5 0.25 Y 6
ISOHept9 Heptane 30 1 0.5 0.25 Y 10
ISONylon10 Nylon 10 1 0.5 0.25 N

30

ISOPP11 PolyProp 10 1 0.5 0.25 N 35
ISOHeptD12 Heptane 30 2 0.25 0.25 Y 10
ISOHeptD13 Heptane 30 2 0.25 0.25 Y 10
ISOPropD14 Propanol 30 2 0.25 0.25 Y 12
ISOProp15 Propanal 30 1 0.5 0.25 Y 10
ISOStyrene16 PolyStyrene 10 1 0.5 0.25 N 35
ISOStyrene17 PolyStyrene 30 1 1 0.25 Y 37
ISOPP18 PolyProp 20 2 0.5 0.25 Y 40
ISOHept19 Heptane 30 1 0.5 0.25 Y 10
ISOToluene20 Toluene 20 1 0.5 0.25 Y 10
ISOStyrene21 PolyStyreen 15 1 0.5 0.25 N 35
ISOHept22 Heptane Spray 1 0.5 0.25 Y 45
ISOHept23 Heptane Spray 1 0.5 0.125 Y 40
ISOHept24 Heptane Spray 1 0.5 0.125 Y 40
ISOHept25 Heptane Spray 1 0.5 0.5 Y 20
ISOHept26 Heptane Spray 1 0.5 0.5 Y 20
ISOHept27 Heptane Spray 1 0.5 0.125 Y 40
ISOHept28 Heptane Spray 1 0.5 0.25 Y 20
ISOToluene29 Toluene Spray 1 0.5 0.25 Y 35
ISOPropanol30 Propanol Spray 1 0.5 0.25 Y 35
ISONG32 Natural Gas pool fed 1 0.28 0.25 Y 25
Created January 6, 2012, Updated January 6, 2017