Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Eaves and Vents Experiments (EaVE) Phase A

Research Overview

This experimental study involved noncombustible steel sheds at varying fuel loads and structure separation distances (SSDs) from the target structure. The target structure included an assembly of an exterior residential wall, a roof, and an eave vent. A range of measurements were taken during the experiments including heat release rate, heat flux, temperature, gas flow velocity, and gas species concentration using open-path absorption spectroscopy. Video and infrared cameras recorded the experiments. Thermal exposures from different types of sheds with different fuel loadings were found to be very repeatable when quantified in terms of heat release rate (HRR), heat fluxes and temperatures measured at the eaves. In the case of thermal exposures from the noncombustible steel sheds, ignition of the eaves was a function of flame jetting from the door opening and sustained incident peak heat flux at the eaves. Higher fuel packing density in the shed resulted in focused flame jetting and increased the likelihood of an eave ignition. The same fuel loading in different types of sheds resulted in different thermal exposures on the target structure. Thermal exposures to the target structure increased linearly with the fuel mass, however, the eave ignition was a function of flame jetting. Eave ignition started with glowing ignition in thermally vulnerable locations including sharp edges, corners, and joints of the rafters. The performance of three commercially available fire-resistant eave vents was assessed when subjected to much larger fire exposures (1.5 MW to 2.5 MW) compared to the fire exposure (300 kW) specified in the existing test methods. The vent performance was assessed primarily for flame penetration and temperature rise on the unexposed side of the vent. Amongst the commercially available vents tested in this experimental series, the performance of the intumescent coated baffle vents was superior compared to the intumescent coated honeycomb core vents during very high thermal exposures. Intumescent coated honeycomb core vents that comply with ASTM E2886 and are listed as WUI compliant products, failed to prevent flame penetration when exposed to large thermal exposures, particularly when eave ignition occurs. The current standardized eave vent test methods may not adequately expose the eave vents to real-WUI fire type of exposures. The knowledge generated from this experimental series will inform standards development organizations to consider revising the existing test methods for qualifying the vents for usage in WUI constructions. The exposure quantification data generated from this experimental series will be useful for hazard mitigation and reducing structure ignitions from large thermal exposures. The exposure quantification information will be useful in managing thermal exposures from auxiliary fuels and other exposures, particularly in WUI communities.

Experiment Name Plot of Heat Release Rate Ignition Photo Date/Time Sort descending Specimen Fuel Type Test Duration (min) Total Heat Released (MJ) Peak HRR (kW)
NGQC_15m_50kgs_R2
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
Tube Burner Natural Gas
25.77
2,800
5,049
p1_SNm0
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
43.73
1,399
1,351
p2_SVSh0
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
44.68
2,196
2,105
p3_SNl0
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
32.43
685
758
p4_SCl0
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
30.28
757
976
p5_SNh0
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
45.57
2,015
1,897
p6_SVSl0
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
35.85
1,453
1,518
e7_SCh0-5
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
19.83
825
1,856
e8_SCl0-5
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
22.02
613
846
e9_SCm0-5
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
25.45
947
1,137
e10_SCh0-5-R1
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
20.22
882
2,073
e11_SCh0-5-R2
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
17.22
560
1,742
e12_SNl0-0
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
29.48
719
746
e13_SNi0-0
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
28.28
902
1,085
e14_SNm0-0
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
29.38
1,115
1,278
e15_SNh0-0
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
25.27
1,226
2,340
e16_SNh0-0-R1
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
33.07
1,054
2,086
e17_SVSl0-5
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
28.27
1,115
1,352
e18_SVSh0-5
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
24.50
1,188
1,937
e19_SVSh0-5-R1
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
22.07
1,050
1,773
e20_SCh0-5
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
42.12
1,260
1,379
e21_SCh0-5-R1
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
52.78
1,275
1,413
e22_SVSh0-5
Plot of Fire Heat Release Rate with event markers. Uncertainty bar shown at peak value.
Ignition
wood cribs in steel shed Cellulose
40.32
2,193
2,674

Bryant, R. and Bundy, M. The NIST 20 MW Calorimetry Measurement System for Large-Fire Research, Technical Note (NIST TN) 2077, 2019
https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2077

NIST Fire Calorimetry Database (FCD)
https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-2314

Last Updated November 19, 2025
Was this page helpful?