Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Taking Measure

Just a Standard Blog

Ideas Whose Time Has Come (and Gone), v. 2017

Diagram with blue background and man standing behind rope line
Credit: Credit: N. Hanacek/NIST

A catchphrase from a popular reality show goes: “One day you're in. And the next day, you're out.” For the purposes of the show, the host is referencing fashion. But the same could be said about science. With each new discovery or advance, an old theory or idea often becomes obsolete … or at least less important.

We here in the NIST public affairs office thought it might be fun to list some of the NIST-relevant scientific ideas that we think are on their way in and out in 2017. While the items on the list below may not be as monumental as the discoveries that led to this year’s Nobel Prizes, MacArthur Foundation “genius” grants or Breakthrough Prizes, we still think they’re pretty important and could contribute to a better future.

Your opinion may vary.

OUT: Elements 113, 115, 117 and 118
IN: nihonium (Nh), moscovium (Mc), tennessine (Ts) and oganesson (Og)

Someone needs to update the lyrics to the Periodic Table of the Elements song (This version contains ads. NIST doesn’t endorse any commercial products). In December, the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) officially named the four newest elements on the periodic table. The elements were named after the locations or individuals who discovered the elements. The names originally were proposed in June and then underwent a five-month waiting period before being approved by the IUPAC Bureau. While NISTonium may not exist yet (what’s up with that?), we’ve made it our business to study and publish exhaustive data on the properties of all the elements, named and unnamed. Check out our updated periodic table, and maybe take a moment to read NIST physicist Charles Clark’s take on the periodic table’s turnover.

The new NIST periodic table.

OUT: Single atomic clock
IN: Dual atomic clocks

For atomic clocks, more is merrier. Physicists at NIST announced in November that they had set yet another world record for clock stability when they combined two experimental atomic clocks based on ytterbium atoms. The approach used by the scientists ultimately may lead to reduced atomic clock size and complexity at state-of-the-art performance, which means we may soon see extremely good portable atomic clocks. (Though probably not so portable that they can replace your wristwatch.) Why should you care? Portable optical atomic clocks could be used for geodesy, which could help to map Earth’s gravity or be carried on spacecraft for tests of general relativity.

OUT: Only using 13 DNA markers
IN: Using 20 DNA markers

Also in quantity-can-make-for-quality-related news, the number of DNA markers in a forensic DNA profile is going up. Currently, DNA profiles in the U.S. are created by looking at 13 specific regions of DNA called markers. On January 1, 2017, the FBI will start requiring that all DNA profiles entered into their Combined DNA Index System, or CODIS, be based on at least 20 markers. And three of those seven new markers were originally characterized here at NIST. This upgrade will greatly increase the power of DNA profiling as a crime-fighting tool.

Puzzle Illustration
Credit: Natasha Hanacek/NIST
Until now, forensic DNA profiles in the United States have been a series of 26 numbers that can be used to identify an individual. When DNA evidence yields only a partial profile, some of the numbers will be missing. In the case illustrated here, 13 numbers, represented by puzzle pieces, are missing. There may not be sufficient information to establish an identity. 
DNA Marker Puzzle Illustration
Credit: Natasha Hanacek/NIST
Starting January 1, 2017, forensic DNA profiles in the United States will be a series of 40 numbers. The case illustrated here also has 13 numbers missing, yet there is still sufficient information to establish an identity. These upgraded profiles are based in part on research by NIST scientists including Mike Coble, pictured above, and colleagues.

OUT (almost): International Prototype Kilogram
IN: Watt Balance

OK, it’s not fully “out” yet, but it’s on its way there. NIST is part of an international effort to redefine the kilogram based on a fundamental constant of nature instead of a plum-sized cylinder of platinum-iridium alloy that currently serves as the world’s mass standard. The goal is to introduce the new measurement standard to the world in 2018. Who says we all can’t get along?

OUT: Friction OR viscosity between tiny particles
IN: Friction AND viscosity between tiny particles

While we’re on the subject of everyone getting along, a favorite science fair experiment centers around examining the odd behavior of non-Newtonian substances. These shear-thickening fluids, such as “oobleck,” can go back and forth between liquid and solid based on how you treat them. Oobleck, which is a mix of cornstarch and water, goes from a gooey slurry to a thick, almost-solid substance just by pounding or squeezing it and reverts back to a slurry when you stop.

What causes the change in state—friction or viscosity between crowded tiny particles—has been long debated. As it turns out, it’s both. A NIST/Georgetown study found that both friction and viscous crowding of tiny particles play a role in the substance’s odd behavior. Although this may seem like scientific minutia, efforts are currently underway to use the properties of shear thickening to make better body armor for police and the military. And when they do, we’ll help to test and develop standards for that, too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsMQhFTYj2A

OUT: Crazy $%*#@ Passw0rd requir3ments!
IN: Free range passwords

It turns out you’re not the only one worn out by all the crazy password requirements! In May, NIST offered the public a preview of the draft Digital Authentication Guideline document, which includes new guidance on password policies to be used by the U.S. government. Included in the (draft) recommendations: allowing for longer passwords; removing special character requirements (e.g., being told you must have at least one letter, one number, and one special character); allowing spaces and most other characters in passwords; doing away with password hints; and a few other changes that NIST believes will simultaneously improve usability and security. (The official public comment period will open in early 2017.) And for those of you looking for back up when talking to your IT department about how tired you are of mandatory password changes, check out this research from NIST’s Mary Theofanos.

So what did you think? What ideas did we miss? Let us know in the comments!

About the author

Robin Materese

Robin Materese is the director of web content at NIST. An aspiring journalist in college, she fell into science communications when she took a job promoting general interest science books at the...

Related posts

Top 6 NIST News Stories of 2019

Measurement is a subject that touches upon just about everything, from the food we eat and the medicines we take to our investigations of the fundamental

Top 5 NIST Blog Posts of 2019

It’s December, and that means it’s time for us to reflect on the past year, and what a year it was! This year tens of thousands of people tuned into the

Unboxing a New Spin-Triplet Superconductor

Nature often reveals itself in surprising ways, so scientists, who study nature, have a lot of opportunities to be surprised. Over the past year and a half, I

Comments

Excellent story Robin! Enjoyed it very much. Ed
You could run a section on the current state of bitemark identification according to the President's Council on Sci and tech 2016 report. In a desperate move, its adherents now think they can use it to protect the innocent via exclusion of suspects, thereby leaving one person a remaining suspect. Pretty nimble, I would say.
You should highlight some of the changes in forensic science. Retroactive case reviews in Texas and the Forensic Science Commission's rejection of microscopic hair comparison and bite marks, for a start. The PCAST report would be worth reviewing as well.
I look forward to see global database of medicinal plants and herbs showing its chemical conistiuents , biological effects , dose and side effects . There are many published researches and medical trials about medicinal plants and herbs . This database can help researchers and common people all around the world thanks and best regards
Enjoyed this very much. Fun, informative, witty. Thanks.

Add new comment

  • This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Image CAPTCHA
    Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please be respectful when posting comments. We will post all comments without editing as long as they are appropriate for a public, family friendly website, are on topic and do not contain profanity, personal attacks, misleading or false information/accusations or promote specific commercial products, services or organizations. Posts that violate our comment policy will not be posted.