NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
David Flater, Edward J. Barkmeyer Jr., Evan K. Wallace
Abstract
Intelligent control of discrete parts manufacturing jobs and machinery requires state models for the jobs and the controllers. Different approaches to control have yielded different state models. While a dominant model is yet to emerge, the advantages and shortcomings of the existing models suggest some design principles for future efforts; most importantly, the demarcations between the shop level of control and the workcell level, and between the job, the lot, the controller, and the machine, should be wee-defined.
Flater, D.
, Barkmeyer Jr., E.
and Wallace, E.
(1997),
State Models for Jobs and Job Supervisors, NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, [online], https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.6037, https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=821135
(Accessed October 11, 2025)