NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
To obtain a quantitative assessment of the state of automatic face recognition, we performed a meta-analysis of performance results of face recognition algorithms in the literature. The analysis was conducted on 24 papers that report identification performance on frontal facial images and used either the FERET or ORL database in their experiments. The 24 papers contained 68 performance scores that included 40 performance scores on novel algorithms, and matching baseline performance scores for 33 of the 40 scores. There are three main conclusions from the analysis. The first conclusion is that the majority of experiments do not adequately model challenging problems and their results have saturated performance levels. The second conclusion is that authors do not adequately document their experiments. Only twelve out of the 24 papers in this study provided complete documentation. The third conclusion is that performance results for novel or experimental algorithms need to be accompanied by baseline algorithm performance scores.
Phillips, P.
and Newton, E.
(2001),
Meta-Analysis of Face Recognition Algorithms, NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, [online], https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.6719
(Accessed October 8, 2025)