Identifying uncertainty in Laser Powder Bed Fusion models
Felipe F. Lopez, Paul Witherell, Brandon Lane
A limitation frequently encountered in additive manufacturing (AM) models is a lack of indication about their precision and accuracy. Often overlooked, information on model uncertainty is required for validation of AM models, qualification of AM-produced parts, and uncertainty management. This paper presents a discussion on the origin and propagation of uncertainty in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) models. Four sources of uncertainty are identified: modeling assumptions, unknown simulation parameters, numerical approximations, and measurement error in calibration data. Techniques to quantify uncertainty in each source are presented briefly, along with estimation algorithms to diminish prediction uncertainty with the incorporation of online measurements. The methods are illustrated with a case study based on a transient, stochastic thermal model designed for melt pool width predictions. Model uncertainty is quantified for single track experiments and the effect of online estimation in overhanging structures is studied via simulation. The application of these concepts to estimation and control of the L-PBF process is suggested.
Proceedings of the ASME 2016 Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC2016)
June 27-July 1, 2016
Blacksburg, VA, US
The ASME 2016 Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC2016)
, Witherell, P.
and Lane, B.
Identifying uncertainty in Laser Powder Bed Fusion models, Proceedings of the ASME 2016 Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC2016), Blacksburg, VA, US, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=919851
(Accessed June 8, 2023)