Barnes, B.
and , M.
(2020),
Contrasting Conventional and Machine Learning Approaches to Optical Critical Dimension Measurements, Proceedings of the SPIE, San Jose, CA, [online], https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2551504
(Accessed April 25, 2024)
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Contrasting Conventional and Machine Learning Approaches to Optical Critical Dimension Measurements
Published
Author(s)
,
Abstract
Accurate, optics-based measurement of feature sizes at deep sub-wavelength dimensions has been conventionally challenged by improved manufacturing, including smaller linewidths, denser layouts, and greater materials complexity at near-atomic scales. Electromagnetic modeling is relied upon heavily for forward solutions to the inverse problem of optical measurements for parametric estimation. Machine learning (ML) approaches are continually under consideration, either as a means to bypass direct comparison to simulation or as a method to augment nonlinear regression. In this work, both ML approaches are investigated using a well-characterized experimental data set and its simulation library that assumes a 2-D geometry. The benefits and limitations of ML for optical critical dimension (OCD) metrology are illustrated by comparing a straightforward library look-up method and two ML approaches, nonlinear regression with radial basis functions (RBF) and multiple-output Gaussian process regression (GPR) that indirectly utilizes the simulation data. Both RBF and GPR generally improve accuracy over the conventional method with as few as 32 training points. However, as measurement noise is decreased the uncertainties from RBF and GPR differ greatly as the GPR posterior estimate of the variance appears to overestimate parametric uncertainties. Both accuracy and uncertainty must be addressed in OCD while balancing simulation versus ML computational requirements.Proceedings Title
Proceedings of the SPIE
Volume
11325
Conference Dates
February 24-27, 2020
Conference Location
San Jose, CA
Conference Title
Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV
Pub Type
Conferences
Download Paper
Citation
Created March 24, 2020, Updated June 1, 2020