(February 1999)
More than ever before, technological leadership is vital to the national interest of the United States. The nation's capability to harness the power and promise of leading-edge technologies will determine, in large measure, its prosperity, security, and global influence in the 21st century.
Leading economists estimate that technology accounts for as much as 50 percent of the nation's long-term economic growth. The study Technology, Economic Growth, and Employment: New Research from the Department of Commerce found that firms using advanced technologies are significantly more productive, pay higher wages, offer more secure jobs, and increase employment more rapidly than those that do not. But global competition is intensifying. Nations everywhere have recognized the link between technology and growth and are developing policies and programs to enhance industrial competitiveness and fuel technology-driven growth and job creation.
The Clinton Administration has sought to address these economic and competitive realities by developing, in partnership with American industry, policies and programs that enhance U.S. competitiveness in the global marketplace and maximize technology's contribution to national economic growth, job creation, and quality of life. The focal point for these efforts is the Technology Administration (TA), the primary civilian technology agency working with industry to improve U.S. competitiveness. TA serves as an advocate for U.S. innovation and industrial competitiveness within the Department of Commerce, other federal agencies, and national and international fora. It carries out this role through:
To continue the successful implementation of this civilian technology agenda in fiscal year (FY) 2000, the President requests:
Office of the Under Secretary/Office of Technology Policy
Total funding requested: $9 million
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Total funding requested: $735 million
National Technical Information Service
Total funding requested: $2 million
Specific budget proposals are described below.
President Clinton requests $9 million for the Office of the Under Secretary for Technology and the Office of Technology Policy (US/OTP). This request supports US/OTP's mission and functions necessary to meet critical Administration and Congressional civilian technology priorities. US/OTP is responsible for working with the private sector to analyze, develop, coordinate, and advocate national policies that maximize technology's contribution to U.S. competitiveness, economic growth, the creation of high-wage jobs, and improvements in living standards for all Americans.
The request, an overall decrease of $523,000 from the FY 1999 appropriation, will support the Under Secretary in overseeing the Technology Administration's three operating units (OTP, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the National Technical Information Service), coordinating several interagency civilian technology efforts, and providing analysis and leadership in other important technology-related domestic and international activities. The US/OTP budget also supports the Office of Space Commercialization (OSC).
In FY 2000, US/OTP will continue to provide leadership and analytical activities—in close partnership with U.S. industry, federal research agencies, and the national laboratories—to maximize taxpayers' return on their investment in federal research and development (R&D). The FY 2000 budget proposal includes a $1 million increase to core programs to enable US/OTP to:
The proposal also requests a decrease of $1.7 million for the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Technology (EPSCoT), which is designed to foster the development of indigenous technology assets in states and regions traditionally under-represented in federal R&D funding. No new grants will be made in FY 2000; instead, a full-scale evaluation of EPSCoT will be undertaken.
For more than 15 years, OTP (as well as its predecessor, the Office of Productivity, Technology and Innovation) has been an important voice for industry, working with other federal agencies, Congress, and international groups to foster U.S. innovation and competitiveness. For example, as the competitive environment has changed, US/OTP has served as a forceful advocate for improvements in the laws and regulations governing the commercialization of federal research, including removing barriers to government-industry cooperative research, ensuring effective protection of intellectual property, and expanding small business access to the federal research enterprise.
OTP's long track record of success continued during the past year:
US/OTP evaluates its performance and plans its work through extensive and ongoing consultation with public- and private-sector stakeholders,output tracking, and selected peer reviews. With the exception of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV), these measures are direct and verifiable counts of US/OTP staff activities, business processes, and analytical output. Peer review of the PNGV is conducted by the National Research Council, which has well-established procedures for ensuring objective, thorough expert reviews.
The FY 2000 request supports the Under Secretary's participation in the Committee on Technology of the President's National Science and Technology Council. This committee, which helps to establish clear national goals for federal science and technology investments and to ensure that federal civilian R&D priorities reflect the requirements of industry customers, is coordinating major Administration R&D initiatives in materials, construction and building, manufacturing infrastructure, and electronics and automotive technologies. The FY 2000 budget also supports the international activities of the Under Secretary as the principal U.S. government representative for technology in the U.S.-Japan Economic Framework Talks, the U.S.-Egypt Partnership for Economic Growth, the U.S.-Israel Science and Technology Commission, and the Presidential initiative to support the peace process in Northern Ireland.
In addition, the FY 2000 budget supports the Under Secretary's role as the chair of the high-level committee overseeing the PNGV initiative, a partnership of seven federal agencies, 19 national laboratories, U.S. auto makers, and more than 300 hundred suppliers and universities. US/OTP's base resources support the operations of the PNGV Secretariat, which is responsible for coordination of participating federal agencies, liaison with USCAR (which represents the auto industry in the partnership), and basic record keeping. The PNGV initiative has made strong progress toward achieving its R&D goals, which were established in three areas: advanced manufacturing methods; technologies leading to near-term improvements in automobile efficiency, safety, and emissions; and research leading to vehicle prototypes offering a threefold improvement in fuel efficiency. The four key system areas considered most promising have been selected, and R&D efforts now are focused on hybrid-electric vehicle drive systems, direct-injection engines, fuel cells, and lightweight materials.
Among other activities, the FY 2000 budget supports US/OTP's administration of the National Medal of Technology, the nation's highest award for technological achievement that helps increase public understanding of the essential role that technology plays in the global economy. The budget also supports the OSC's continued role in the development of new national space policies and in publishing information on current business trends in commercial space. In addition, it funds the Commerce Science and Technology Fellowship Program, which will place approximately 20 senior government technologists in other agencies to promote understanding of the scope of federal R&D and policy activities.
In FY 2000, US/OTP will manage the Partnerships for a Competitive Economy (PACE) initiative. Working with state and local governments, business, and academia, US/OTP conducts PACE conferences around the country to maintain a dialogue with the private sector on how best to help companies and workers compete and win in the rapidly changing economy of the 21st century. US/OTP also will promote technology-based economic development through the U.S. Innovation Partnership initiative, which seeks to leverage the resources of U.S. industry; academia; and federal, state, and local governments and to create synergy among complementary programs. In addition, through its Meeting the Challenge effort, US/OTP will analyze the competitive status of U.S. firms in several crucial U.S. industries. US/OTP will publish reports on two additional key industries in FY 2000, similar to those previously done on the chemical, steel, automobile, biotechnology, and environmental technologies industries.
The President requests an additional $1 million increase for US/OTP efforts in three key areas. First, US/OTP will expand its analysis and advocacy of current and proposed federal and state economic, technology, and regulatory policies and its research on their impact on innovation and U.S. competitiveness. Second, US/OTP will continue its successful efforts to help the nation meet the rapidly growing demand for IT workers. US/OTP will work closely with industry, state and local governments, and educational institutions at all levels to develop innovative strategies and programs to educate and train American workers for these high-quality, high-wage jobs. Third, the rapid development and deployment of new automotive technologies, together with the expected introduction of new and reformulated fuels, has the potential to revolutionize the global auto industry. In FY 2000, US/OTP will build on existing programs within the Technology Administration to help the automotive suppliers and auto-producing states seize the opportunities that emerge.
FY 2000 will be an evaluation year for EPSCoT. The grant process was initiated in FY 1998 by US/OTP in partnership with state and local governments. By FY 2000, EPSCoT will have conducted two grant competitions, and most of the projects funded under the first competition will be complete or nearing completion. No grants will be made in FY 2000. Instead, a full-scale evaluation effort will assess the management, direction, and effectiveness of the program in meeting its stated objectives, and examine current needs. Therefore the FY 2000 budget proposes a decrease of $1.7 million for EPSCoT.
The Administration's fiscal year (FY) 2000 budget request to Congress includes $735* million for the Technology Administration's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), an increase of about 15 percent over its FY 1999 budget of $641 million.
*All numbers rounded. See the budget summary table for actual figures.
The NIST FY 2000 budget request is divided into three appropriations:
$290 million for Scientific and Technical Research and Services, including $285 million for the Measurement and Standards Laboratories and $5 million for the Baldrige National Quality Program (BNQP);
NIST's four interrelated, merit-based programs—Measurement and Standards Laboratories, ATP, MEP, and BNQP—work together to provide the technical capabilities that U.S. industry needs to turn scientific and technological advances into commercial products and services in a timely manner. With more and more nations able to produce and distribute world-class technology products and services at competitive prices, the key to continued U.S. economic growth will be faster commercialization of one of the nation's key advantages—the best science and innovation in the world. NIST's challenge is to anticipate and develop the technology, measurements, and standards required to meet industry needs now and in the future. Its programs must keep pace with numerous technology trends, such as the miniaturization and increasing speed of electronics, the rapid growth of electronic commerce and information systems, the emergence of advanced manufacturing systems, and revolutionary advances in life sciences applications.
To meet these needs, the request for FY 2000 will:
NIST promotes U.S. economic growth by working with industry to develop and apply technology, measurements, and standards. This work is increasingly important to the nation for a number of reasons. First, globalization of markets is creating an urgent need to harmonize divergent national systems of measurement, standards, and conformity assessment. Second, rapid technological change, combined with quality and cost pressures, is heightening the need for new standards in emerging industries and ever more precise measurements in established sectors. Third, technology development today requires a wide range of scientific and technical competencies, a fact that encourages industry to rely on external sources of measurement and standards technology and expertise. NIST's Measurement and Standards Laboratories lead the way in meeting national needs in these areas.
Fourth, U.S. firms invest heavily in research and development (R&D) but seldom focus on infrastructure or multiuse technologies or projects requiring long-term investments. Furthermore, in nascent technology areas, the cost, technical complexity, and risks of R&D increase the need for collaboration. NIST's ATP helps address these needs by sharing the risks and costs of challenging research and promoting partnerships. Fifth, although small firms are critical links in supply chains and generate large numbers of jobs (over 65 percent of the manufacturing workforce), their productivity often is limited by technical and cost barriers to technology adoption. The MEP helps small and medium-sized companies overcome these barriers. Finally, technology has the greatest positive effect on organizations when it is complemented by quality management practices, which enhance performance and productivity. The BNQP recognizes improvement in performance by U.S. firms and disseminates criteria for performance excellence.
NIST uses diverse and complementary sources of performance data to evaluate its products, services, and processes thoroughly. The results consistently show that NIST provides the best, or among the best, technology and services of its type in the world and, moreover, has a powerful positive impact on U.S. firms and the overall economy. The full value of research programs is difficult to evaluate, however, because of the challenges involved in quantifying new knowledge and assessing impacts that often accrue over long time periods across many segments of industry and society.
A comprehensive and rigorous evaluation system for the Measurement and Standards Laboratories is based on a combination of external peer review and internal benchmarking, microeconomic impact studies, and quantitative performance measures. The National Research Council manages panels of industry, academic, and government experts who annually review and critique NIST laboratory programs. In addition, a permanent Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology meets quarterly to review and assess NIST's overall programs and priorities. To ensure that its laboratories perform world-class research that provides technical leadership for the nation's measurement infrastructure, NIST performs benchmarking assessments of its capabilities relative to other national metrology institutes. Most recent benchmarking efforts show, for example, that NIST is the best in the world in measuring amounts of substances, temperature, humidity, air speed, ultrasonic pressure, and certain ranges of pressure and vacuum.
Quantitative performance measures reflect the laboratories' technology transfer activities and the usefulness of their products and services to industry. For example, in FY 1998, NIST calibrated over 3,500 items, providing quality assurance for an even larger private-sector activity that disseminates standards traceable to the national and international measurement systems. In addition, NIST sold almost 37,000 units of Standard Reference Materials—certified "rulers" that companies, government agencies, and others use to check the accuracy of their most exacting measurements. NIST also distributed about 5,000 standard reference database units, which provide evaluated, high-quality data used by scientists and by many industries for applications such as improving the design of industrial processes, the quality of materials, and the performance of advanced information technology systems.
Economic impact studies of NIST's laboratory programs show high rates of return and important benefits to industry. For example, NIST's most recent economic impact assessment focusing on mathematical models and related measurement infrastructure for semiconductor design automation, measured impacts on R&D efficiency, productivity, and product quality that yield a benefit-cost ratio of approximately 23:1 and a social rate of return of about 76 percent. Another recent assessment of NIST work on characterizing the chemical properties of alternative refrigerants estimated a benefit-cost ratio of 4:1 and a social rate of return of 433 percent. The measured benefits included R&D efficiency gains realized by U.S. refrigerant manufacturers and product quality and productivity gains realized by heating and cooling equipment manufacturers. A study of ceramic phase diagrams revealed impacts on R&D efficiency and productivity among ceramic component suppliers, yielding an estimated benefit-cost ratio of 10:1 and a social rate of return of 33 percent.
The ATP has developed a multi-faceted evaluation strategy that includes statistical profiling of projects, real-time monitoring of project developments, microeconomic case studies that detail outcomes over defined periods, and macroeconomic projections of long-term program and project impacts. Approximately 110 new technologies have been commercialized as a result of ATP funding, and evaluation results show that the ATP is successfully improving the capabilities of U.S. businesses to generate economic returns from scientific and technological innovations for the nation.
For example, the status reports on all ATP projects completed as of March 1997 show that technologies developed by 15 of the 38 completed projects have been incorporated into commercially available products or services, and that the economic benefits are expected to be broad in scope and large in magnitude. According to a recent ATP study of more than 200 projects funded from 1993 through 1995, ATP is:
The MEP pursues extensive evaluation and assessment activities to assure effective management and performance and demonstrate program benefits. An MEP National Advisory Board composed of leaders from industry, state and local governments, academia, and labor has been established to independently assess programs, plans, and policies. In addition, independent reviews are conducted of individual MEP center operations and outcomes using BNQP criteria. These reviews rely on a variety of metrics, including interim impacts on client competitiveness (e.g., increased sales, cost savings, capital investment, and inventory savings) based on regular surveys by the Census Bureau and detailed analysis of the operations and performance of individual centers.
Census surveys indicate that the manufacturing extension centers are fostering significant improvements in manufacturing and business performance. For example, based on a recent sampling of client companies, MEP estimates that in FY 1998 alone MEP services generated approximately $329 million* in new sales, $33 million in labor and material savings, and $44 million in inventory savings, while also leveraging $256 million in additional capital investment by client firms.
* Data updated January 1999.
The BNQP is evaluated by a Board of Overseers, a prestigious group of national quality and business experts. The BNQP also uses a questionnaire and other means to ensure its ongoing responsiveness to the needs of U.S. industry and business. Ultimately, the program can be judged by the performance of companies that follow its lead. A new NIST stock investment study shows, for the fourth year in a row, that quality management can result in impressive returns. When a hypothetical $1,000 was "invested" in the Standard and Poor's (S&P) 500 and in each of the 18 companies that won the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award from 1988 to 1997, the companies' stock outperformed the S&P 500 by about 2.4 to 1.
Since 1988, more than 1.7 million copies of the Baldrige criteria for performance excellence have been distributed. The criteria, which are reviewed annually to ensure continual improvement, have been described as "probably the single most influential document in the modern history of American business." A 1998 survey of chief executive officers found that 79 percent believe the Baldrige criteria and awards are extremely or very valuable in stimulating improvements in quality in U.S. companies, and 67 percent believe the criteria and awards are extremely or very valuable in stimulating improvements in the competitiveness of U.S. business.
The NIST laboratories serve as the ultimate U.S. reference point for measurements, working with counterpart organizations throughout the world to provide companies, entire industries, and the science and technology community with the equivalent of a common language needed at nearly every stage of a technical activity. The labs also further the technical aims and capabilities of U.S. industry and serve as impartial sources of expertise, developing highly leveraged measurement capabilities and other infrastructure technologies.
NIST laboratories perform a multitude of essential functions. For example, NIST's electrical measurements help advance the growing $350 billion electronics sector, providing the microwave antenna measurements used by every major U.S. aerospace company and the national reference standards that support the accuracy of the electric power meters in every U.S. home and business. NIST provides the measurement capabilities underlying voluntary standards for the manufacture of U.S.-made optical fiber communications lines, supporting an industry that competes in a $10 billion world market.
NIST also develops and disseminates national standards for time and frequency to meet critical needs in telecommunications, transportation, and positioning (including support for the Global Positioning System). The laboratories provide chemical, biochemical, and chemical engineering measurements; standards; data; calibrations; and predictive methods and models to support industries and programs ranging from chemical processing to environmental monitoring to biotechnology and health care to semiconductor manufacturing. As the global market demands ever higher quality, U.S. industries depend on NIST for calibration services that ensure dimensional compatibility of items manufactured at different sites and satisfy requirements for traceability to national standards.
In addition, NIST provides national standards for the 11,000 U.S. mammography facilities and for exposure quality in the $10 billion U.S. photographics and X-ray film industry. The NIST Center for Neutron Research, a world-class facility where unique instruments reveal the inner structure and dynamics of virtually any material, is used annually by about 1,300 researchers from more than 50 U.S. companies, 90 universities, and 30 other government agencies. NIST operates the foremost U.S. fire research laboratory and is the principal R&D agency working to reduce earthquake hazards through improved building codes and standards and practices for structures and lifelines. NIST also supports the U.S. information technology sector, which adds $680 billion to the gross domestic product annually, by developing test methods, computer science and engineering methods that underpin metrology, and open testbeds for industrial collaboration. NIST supports economic growth through the Internet by developing test methods and security services for infrastructure, encryption, and data sharing.
In addition to its internal research, in FY 1998, NIST worked on about 325 Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs) involving collaborative R&D of mutual interest with for-profit organizations, non-profit organizations (including universities), public and private foundations, state and local governments, and individuals. Since 1988, NIST has signed more than 830 CRADAs.
The FY 2000 appropriation for the Measurement and Standards Laboratories will support further development of critical measurement technologies and methods, calibration services, national standards, and reference data needed by the United States to promote technological progress, improve product and service quality and reliability, and enhance international competitiveness. For example, the NIST laboratories plan to:
One-third of the growth of the U.S. economy depends on exports. In 1997, total U.S. exports amounted to $960 billion, supporting one in five U.S. manufacturing jobs and accounting for 2 million new jobs in the past four years. And yet, while world trade has been increasing by 15 percent annually, total U.S. exports have risen only 9 percent, and exports to the European Union are growing at less than 5 percent annually. This problem can be attributed in part to local or regional technical standards that serve as barriers to U.S. exports.
The FY 2000 $2 million initiative will support a strategy to remove or avert technical barriers to trade by increasing worldwide recognition of U.S. measurements and standards and streamlining the domestic standards development process.
Comparisons of U.S. national measurement standards with those of other nations are essential to ensure that American products are not rejected simply because of disagreements over the methods used to perform a measurement or test. As new technologies emerge and national economies grow, the number and frequency of such comparisons are rising. NIST will expand related activities in physical, electrical, and radiometric measurements and improve or develop new capabilities in emerging and high-technology areas such as information technology and biotechnology. In addition, to meet rapidly increasing demand for chemical measurement standards, NIST will expand its portfolio of Standard Reference Materials and seek agreements with trading partners assuring mutual recognition of each partner's standards. Target areas will include important U.S. export sectors such as automobiles, fuels, pharmaceuticals, medical diagnostics, and food.
NIST also will develop capabilities to help U.S. industry meet the European Union's new requirements that products generate no harmful emissions and be immune to electromagnetic disturbances. Further, NIST will resolve and unify U.S. and international standards efforts for coordinate measuring machines, which are becoming common in automotive, aerospace, heavy equipment, and machine industries. These machines provide highly accurate dimensional measurements of mechanical parts with complex shapes.
Finally, NIST will help to increase U.S. participation in international standards development by providing $1 million to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). ANSI is the official U.S. representative to the International Organization for Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission. An expanded infrastructure of technical measurements and standards coupled with ANSI's strong leadership and participation in the international standards arena will support the growth of U.S. exports by reducing or eliminating technical barriers to trade.
The United States has both the world's strongest military and largest national economy, each of which is increasingly reliant on information technology. Attacks on, or failures of, U.S. information systems could damage and undermine the nation's entire economy. Most existing computer and communications systems are vulnerable, and, if protection is added, it typically is expensive and of questionable effectiveness. Cost-effective technology, measurements, and test methods are needed to help avert catastrophic failures of critical infrastructures due to terrorism, war, or human error and to reduce the fraud, waste, and abuse perpetrated through low-level attacks on the computer and communications infrastructure.
Presidential Decision Directive #63 calls for a national effort to improve the security of critical infrastructures, and the President's FY 2000 budget has made critical infrastructure protection a major priority. DOC is designated as lead agency for the information and communications sector. NIST also has a legislated mandate for computer security. Accordingly, NIST will develop measurements, test methods, and standards needed to help ensure the reliability, trustworthiness, and survivability of information technology systems supporting critical national infrastructures.
The $3 million initiative will focus on efforts in security technology, system survivability, high-confidence systems, security for supervisory systems, and security for federal systems. In the security technology area, NIST will collaborate with industry to accelerate the convergence of standards for public key infrastructure (which includes the mechanisms, procedures, and policies for the deployment of public key cryptography) and the deployment of related products and components. NIST also will develop metrics and test methods and establish testbeds to enable comparisons of products that promote system survivability. NIST will support the development of ultra-dependable computing technology, which is needed, for example, to make it possible for increased numbers of aircraft to share the skies safely. NIST will develop new methods of assurance and new techniques for combining dependable components into integrated systems.
Supervisory systems are used to control processing in major industrial applications. NIST will develop measurement techniques to apply advanced security to two specific types of supervisory systems. The work then will be applied to all supervisory systems.
In addition, NIST will work with other government agencies and the private sector to identify resources and cost-effective strategies for information and help federal agencies implement information assurance best practices.
In the 21st century, science and technology will play increasingly important roles in U.S. economic competitiveness. In all realms of business, productivity gains and market leadership will require technical insight and scientific creativity. However, trends in education threaten to undermine the nation's economic future. Recent international studies of science and math performance show U.S. high school students ranking near the bottom of industrialized nations, and fewer U.S. students are choosing careers in science and technology. Growth in several technical sectors of the U.S. economy already is limited by lack of technically skilled workers, and the problem is expected to worsen in the next decade.
The nation needs to substantially improve science, math, and technical education for all its citizens to maintain economic growth and competitiveness. This challenge is large and complex, but one way of improving science and math education is to enhance the training and development of science and math teachers.
The proposed FY 2000 $500,000 initiative will permit NIST to leverage a modest federal investment for the greatest benefit to science and math teachers nationwide. NIST will develop several ways to enhance teacher development. Approaches include on-site training programs; community-based training programs leveraging NIST contacts with industry; Internet-based, on-demand references and services for teachers that utilize and extend NIST's expertise in forefront Internet capabilities; and other activities that are determined to add real value to professional enhancement of U.S. science and math teachers.
Because the proposed funding is modest relative to the scope of the challenge, NIST will actively seek collaborations with other federal agencies, national education organizations, and the private sector for greatest leverage of federal funds.
The BNQP has become a focal point for strengthening America's competitive position. The program helps many types of companies and organizations deliver ever improving value to customers while improving overall organizational effectiveness. It creates a performance excellence standard that fosters communications and sharing in the private sector, building networks to deliver performance and quality management information and services and to share lessons learned with other economic sectors.
Applicants for the Baldrige Award gain valuable insights by receiving 300 to 1,000 hours of review by at least six experts on the board of examiners, who provide a detailed feedback report on the organization's strengths and opportunities for improvement. Since 1988, 34 companies have received the Baldrige award, which is given in manufacturing, service, small business, and, starting in 1999, education and health care. Thousands of other organizations use the Baldrige criteria internally to assess and improve their performance.
The BNQP has proven to be highly effective in stimulating interest in performance improvement, excellence, sharing and cooperation, and the creation of new information networks within the business and public sectors. Collectively, Baldrige Award recipients, examiners, and NIST staff have given more than 50,000 presentations at conferences worldwide. With a relatively small annual federal investment, the Baldrige program leverages over $100 million in-kind contributions from the private sector and state and local governments.
The FY 2000 appropriations of just over $5 million will be used to manage the annual award competition, conduct a conference at which Baldrige award winners share their performance excellence strategies, maintain a comprehensive database on state and local quality awards, continually improve the performance excellence criteria that serve as the national standard, and facilitate information sharing among all sectors of the U.S. economy.
The ATP shares the cost with industry of developing novel, cutting-edge technologies for a broad range of civilian applications that will promote U.S. economic growth. It fosters partnerships among companies of all sizes, universities, and research centers to help bridge the gap between basic research and product development and create an environment conducive to overcoming daunting technical barriers and addressing long-range R&D opportunities. The program assumes some of the risk of early-stage technology development, enabling industry to pursue promising technologies that otherwise would be ignored or developed too slowly to compete in rapidly changing world markets. The ATP supports R&D to the point where it is feasible for companies to begin product development using private funds. The program does not fund commercialization.
The ATP conducted 39 competitions from 1991 to 1998. Through 1998, the ATP had selected 431 projects for funding, including 146 joint ventures. More than 1,000 participants, including more than 100 different colleges and universities, have been involved. About 55 percent of all ATP projects are led by small businesses. Two-thirds of awards made to single companies have gone to small firms. The awarded projects involve a commitment of over $1.39 billion in NIST funds and $1.40 billion in private-sector funds over their lifetimes. By creating opportunities for new, world-class products, services, and processes, the ATP benefits not only individual project participants but also other companies and industries and, ultimately, consumers and taxpayers.
The awards are made on the basis of a rigorous competitive process that considers the scientific and technical merit of each proposal and its potential benefits to the U.S. economy. Each year, the ATP conducts a general competition open to proposals involving any area of technology. To have a greater impact in important technology areas identified with extensive industry input, the ATP began holding focused program competitions in FY 1994. In FY 1999, the ATP is using a new competition structure that combines the best features of both the general and focused competitions. The competition is open to all areas of technology, but proposals will be evaluated and ranked in competition with others in the same technology area. Five review boards are planned in biotechnology, electronics, information technology, manufacturing, and chemistry/materials.
The proposed FY 2000 appropriation of $239 million will enable the ATP to continue multiyear projects selected in previous years; conduct a new competition open to all areas of technology; and continue to implement a multifaceted economic evaluation program that includes statistical profiling, microeconomic case studies, and macroeconomic projections of long-term project and program impacts. The request, when combined with anticipated carryover and prior year recoveries, will permit approximately $73 million for new awards.
Because small firms already lead 55 percent and participate in 70 percent of all ATP projects, the Administration is proposing, through the appropriation process, that ATP be exempt from the Small Business Innovation Research program set-aside in FY 2000.
The MEP provides small and medium-sized manufacturers with access to technologies, resources, and expertise through the cost-shared, cooperative efforts of NIST, state and local governments, and local extension service providers. The partnership is a nationwide network of regional manufacturing extension centers, which are linked to diverse federal, state, university, and private sources of technology and expertise. Each center uses the network to provide cost-effective services to client firms in areas such as best manufacturing and business practices, workforce development and training, access to financing, and environmental services.
The MEP has succeeded in its initial goal of placing critically needed extension services within reach of small and medium-sized manufacturers in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. More than 2,000 manufacturing specialists and professional staff now provide services through more than 400 MEP-affiliated centers and offices. Approximately 26,000 enterprises were served in FY 1998.
To optimize center performance and further increase the competitiveness of smaller manufacturers, two efforts were initiated recently. First, the BNQP evaluation criteria have been adopted as a framework for generating continuous improvement in MEP-funded center performance and impact. Second, an integrated knowledge management system is being developed to facilitate the sharing of best business practices among the centers.
In addition, MEP is training field staff from the Department of Agriculture, the Small Business Administration, and others so they will be able to conduct in-depth seminars on year 2000 issues for their constituents across the country.
The proposed FY 2000 appropriation of $100 million will enable the MEP to reach additional manufacturers, conduct reviews and manage the nationwide network of extension centers, collect and evaluate data on center performance and impact on client firms, and further develop electronic networking and information capabilities. The request includes $1 million in new funding to gather, promote, and effectively deploy to all MEP manufacturing extension centers the highest priority best practices. Currently, MEP is able to provide only very limited best practice information to centers. Funding under this initiative will enable MEP to accelerate its efforts to meet center demands for best practices information in the areas of center operations, center business practices, and service delivery.
The FY 2000 budget request also proposes a decrease of $9.1 million in MEP funding. This decrease reflects a lower federal share of the centers' operating costs since the federal share changes as the centers mature. In the first three years, the federal share is 50 percent; in year four, 40 percent. In years five and six and for renewals, the federal share is one-third. The number of centers will not change as a result.
NIST maintains about 50 specialized laboratory, office, and support buildings on two campuses in Gaithersburg, Md., and Boulder, Colo. The great majority of those buildings are 30 to 45 years old and are deteriorating at an accelerating rate. NIST has designed a master facilities plan to guide the replacement, renovation, or repair of these buildings so that NIST can continue to provide U.S. industry and science with the best possible measurement system.
The requested FY 2000 appropriation includes $95 million to be combined with $108.3 million already appropriated in FY 1998 and FY 1999 for construction of the Advanced Measurement Laboratory (AML). The AML will allow NIST to provide U.S. industry and science with higher quality NIST reference materials, improved measurements, and faster access to NIST research advances. The AML will provide stringent controls on particulate matter, temperature, vibration, and humidity that are unattainable in current NIST buildings. These new NIST laboratory facilities will be equal to, or better than, similar laboratories overseas. Such conditions are vital for housing the institute's most advanced metrology, physics, chemistry, electronics, engineering, and materials science research and will enable NIST to keep pace with rapid developments in semiconductors, industrial robots, computers, pharmaceuticals, and emerging technologies requiring molecular and atomic-level precision. The AML will be a shared resource for NIST and the industrial and scientific communities that work closely with NIST.
NIST also is requesting $12 million to undertake the highest priority safety, capacity, maintenance, and major repairs to ensure compliance with various federal, state, and local health and safety regulations, to make modifications needed to improve access for people with disabilities, and to keep the existing buildings in reliable working order. This represents a one-time decrease of $5 million to partially offset the cost of the AML construction.
The National Technical Information Service (NTIS) was established in the aftermath of World War II to make available to industry much of the formerly classified research performed throughout the country in support of the war effort as well as captured enemy research. In 1950, the Secretary of Commerce was given the statutory mission to collect and organize scientific, technical, and engineering information "from whatever sources, foreign or domestic, that may be available" and to "make it more readily available to industry and business, and to the general public." Over the course of its 50-year history, NTIS has amassed a collection of more than 3 million items, including the most comprehensive collection of federal research results.
Consistent with its mission, NTIS seeks out, organizes, stores for all time, and makes accessible virtually all federally financed scientific, technical, and engineering reports and complementary material from foreign and other sources. Unlike a commercial enterprise, which would preserve only that material having a significant, immediate commercial value, NTIS preserves material based on its potential use to U.S. industry and business. This ensures public availability to an accessible, convenient central source of information from a variety of sources, as well as a permanent record of the government's massive investment in research and development since the end of World War II.
For many years, NTIS has covered costs through fees for its products and services. However, changes in the information industry have resulted in declining revenues. Because the organization and preservation of this knowledge will benefit generations of future researchers as well as current customers, the proposed FY 2000 budget includes a request for $2 million to partially fund NTIS' activities to organize and preserve the 70,000 technical information items it adds to its permanent clearinghouse each year. The remainder of these $6 million activities, as well as all of NTIS' other costs, will continue to be supported through fees for products and services.
The funding will help to ensure that NTIS will continue to function as a true clearinghouse and, as such, preserve information for future researchers.