NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Derivation of particle number concentration from the size distribution: theory and applications
Published
Author(s)
Natalia Farkas, John A. Kramar, Antonio Montoro Bustos, George Caceres, Monique Johnson, Matthias Roesslein, Elijah Petersen
Abstract
The particle number concentration (PNC) in a suspension is a key measurand in nanotechnology. A common approach for deriving PNC is to divide the total mass concentration by the per-particle mass, calculated as density times volume. The volume is most frequently derived from the arithmetic mean diameter (AMD) of the size distribution. The harmonic mean volume (HMV) has also been used. Given a known size distribution, we show that the correct PNC is obtained by using the arithmetic mean volume (AMV). The AMD-based volume results in an overestimate in PNC that increases superlinearly with increasing coefficient of variation (CV), reaching 12% at CV = 0.2 for a normal distribution. HMV would yield a much greater overestimate, exceeding 50%. The error in the AMD-derived PNC shows only weak skew dependence, suggesting a simple approximate correction as a function of CV in the common situation where AMD and CV are known but the overall size distribution is unknown. Using published data sets of gold nanoparticles, we demonstrate an overall consistency of ±1.1% in comparing the PNC directly determined by single-particle inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (spICP-MS) and the PNCs derived from AMV using size distributions independently measured by high-resolution scanning electron microscopy and spICP-MS. We further compare AMV and AMD-derived PNCs for well-characterized polystyrene nanoparticle standards, illustrating sensitivity to distributional characteristics along with common errors to avoid. Nanoparticles in environmental samples, food additives, and nanomedicines often have CVs greater than 0.3, for which uncorrected AMD-derived PNC errors can exceed 35%.
particle number concentration (PNC), size distribution, single-particle inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (spICP-MS), high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM), total mass concentration (TMC), skew distribution, mean diameter, mean volume, coefficient of variation (CV)
Farkas, N.
, Kramar, J.
, Montoro Bustos, A.
, Caceres, G.
, Johnson, M.
, Roesslein, M.
and Petersen, E.
(2025),
Derivation of particle number concentration from the size distribution: theory and applications, Analytical Chemistry, [online], https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c05990, https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=958200
(Accessed October 10, 2025)