Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Taking Measure

Just a Standard Blog

From 1901 to 2021: Measurements Then and Now

Josephson voltage standard chip with penny for scale

A NIST Josephson voltage chip next to a penny.

Credit: NIST

A lot has changed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in the past 120 years. For one thing, we were known as the National Bureau of Standards for the first 87 years of our existence. Then, in 1988, we became the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), to reflect our agency’s expanding mission and a renewed emphasis on boosting the competitiveness of American industry. But as much as things change, they also stay the same. While much of our early work has been baked into the American economy, NIST continues to be a world leader in advancing measurement science. We still provide many of our original services, though the techniques and technologies have evolved.


NIST didn’t build its own clock at the very beginning. One of the first purchases NIST made was a Riefler clock in 1904 from the Clemens Riefler firm in Germany. The Riefler clock was a highly stable pendulum clock that achieved accuracies to within one-hundredth of a second per day, about 3.5 seconds per year.

an original Riefler clock
A Riefler clock.
Credit: NIST

Today, using technology made possible by the Nobel Prize-winning work of NIST’s Bill Phillips and his colleagues, we use atomic fountain clocks to define the second as the time it takes for 9,192,631,770 cycles of radiation to be emitted from a specially energized cesium atom. The most advanced cesium clock, the NIST-F2, is so accurate that it would neither gain nor lose one second in about 300 million years.

NIST physicists Steve Jefferts and Tom Heavner  with the NIST-F2 cesium fountain atommic clock
NIST physicists Steve Jefferts (foreground) and Tom Heavner with the NIST-F2 cesium fountain atomic clock.
Credit: NIST


The ampere that our founders were using in 1901 was not the same unit of electric current that we use today. In fact, it wasn’t even quite one ampere! Back then, the ampere was practically defined as the current that would electrically deposit a small amount of silver on a negatively charged surface using a device known as a silver voltmeter. That voltmeter in turn had to be calibrated using a standard Weston cell, a type of battery that reliably produced a steady voltage for a reasonably long time.

Man sits at a desk on the left while a man on the right stands looking into a device
Scientist F.A. Wolff (right) operates an oil bath while watching a temperature gauge in order to measure the temperature response of several Weston cells, used to calibrate voltmeters in 1903. His colleague on the left appears to be crafting the mercury thermometers used in the experiment.
Credit: NIST
Chip for 10-volt programmable standards
Josephson junction chip for 10-volt programmable standards.
Credit: Dresselhaus/NIST

Now, the workhorse of precise and accurate primary realizations of the volt the world over is the Josephson junction, only made possible by quantum phenomena that were discovered decades after NIST was founded. A Josephson junction is made from two layers of superconducting materials separated by a layer of atomically thin insulating material. When bathed in a particular frequency of microwave radiation, a quantum mechanical phenomenon known as electron tunneling causes the junction to generate a proportional voltage. NIST now makes Josephson junctions that offer accuracies of better than 1 part per billion and don’t need to ever be calibrated. The standards are used to calibrate voltmeters — devices important to the manufacture of consumer and industrial electronics and even the operation of the electric grid.

Standard Reference Materials

NIST has been producing standard reference materials (SRMs) since 1905. First, we produced standard samples of iron for the American Foundrymen’s Association to aid in metallurgical analysis and quality control. Before long, NIST was making “standard samples” (our original name for SRMs) for hundreds of products and materials. Now, NIST produces more than 1,000 different types of SRMs, each of which has thoroughly measured properties.

Iron SRM 2, 5a, 5d, 5j, 7
Early reference materials.
Credit: NIST
photo of NIST RM 8671
NIST's monoclonal antibody reference material, NIST RM 8671.
Credit: Matthew DeLorme/Matthew DeLorme Photography

Today, we have SRMs for things that people 120 years ago might not have imagined. For instance, our monoclonal antibody reference material. Many of today’s top drugs are based on monoclonal antibodies, customizable proteins that can block pathways for disease and seek out specific cells, such as cancer cells, and deliver chemicals or radiation to them. NIST’s reference material provides a common benchmark that drugmakers can share to verify and improve their methods for quality control.


When NIST was founded, we had our own precision balances constructed for comparing and calibrating masses against the U.S. copies of the International Prototype Kilogram, a small cylinder of platinum and iridium that served as the world’s standard of mass. Those balances would have looked a lot like this Rueprecht balance, which was built in 1901 and bought by NIST in 1945. It was used for primary mass comparisons until 1960, when it was replaced by a NIST-improved version.

researcher loading weights onto a balance scale
Rueprecht balance.
Credit: NIST Digital Archives

Now, the ultimate standard of mass is no longer a physical object. It’s defined in terms of an unchanging number in quantum physics called the Planck constant, which, through a couple of mathematical steps, can convert a certain amount of the energy in electromagnetic radiation to its equivalent in mass. In the laboratory, the kilogram is measured by the electrical energy it takes to hold that mass against the force of Earth’s gravity. We measure that electrical energy using a new kind of balance called a Kibble balance, a technology that NIST and its colleagues at the National Physical Laboratory in the U.K. improved and refined for use to redefine the kilogram.

beauty shot of watt balance in blue light
The NIST-4 Kibble balance.
Credit: J. Lee/NIST


Shortly after its founding, NIST was put to work testing some of the products the government bought to see if they were up to specifications. One problem that plagued the government was how quickly the lightbulbs it bought were burning out. At that time, the government was buying one million incandescent light bulbs per year. NIST tested a selection of commercially available bulbs, and its work showed that many bulbs didn’t conform to the manufacturer's standards or federal specifications. Because the government bought so many products, testing helped improve the quality of not just light bulbs, but countless products from entire industries that wanted to sell to the government.

two researchers examining instruments in a laboratory filled with illuminated lightbulbs
Early NIST lightbulb testbed.
Credit: NIST

NIST is still gathering test data on lighting products. One of the major differences is that it’s no longer incandescent lightbulbs, but LEDs. We’ve all heard that LEDs are supposed to be able to burn for 50,000 hours or more, but how do we know that? Industry tests don’t often simulate the way LEDs are used in real life, so NIST set up a test bed for LEDs to gather data to help improve models of their performance, leading to better products in the real world.

Yuqin Zong with LED timetime test enclosure
Yuqin Zong works on the test chamber within which 480 LEDs are attached to the top of the sphere's interior. The monitor at left shows the image of the test units from a digital camera mounted at the bottom of the sphere.
Credit: NIST

Looking Ahead

NIST’s impact on the past 120 years has been considerable. Now a major thrust of NIST’s work is to move NIST measurements out of our labs and put them directly in the hands of industrial and scientific researchers in the form of chip-based standards for not only voltage and electric current, but also time and temperature and a host of other quantities. The NIST on a Chip program promises to revolutionize the way standard measurements are made. Who knows? Perhaps this could be another turning point in NIST’s history?

About the author

Mark Esser

Mark Esser has been a writer/editor in the NIST Public Affairs Office since October 2007. He has written internal and external news, video scripts,  speeches and other content on a wide variety of subjects. He helped to initiate and served as contributing and managing editor of the NIST Taking Measure blog from 2016 until 2021. He now works in NIST internal communications. 

Related posts


Very proud I'm part of this field to ensure quality outputs. Looking forward to achieving more.

Congratulations NIST, since my youth I have considered NASA its Astronauts the NIST its Metronauts. But we cannot go to space exploration without having an institute like you, I am very grateful for all the work you have done in favor of improving the quality of life on this planet and in the future that we will be.

William Guin- INN Chile

Good overview Mark with many useful links, Thanks, Srikanth

My engineering course ca. 1958 was interesting and useful, but you folks have come eons further in accuracy.

Add new comment

Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Please be respectful when posting comments. We will post all comments without editing as long as they are appropriate for a public, family friendly website, are on topic and do not contain profanity, personal attacks, misleading or false information/accusations or promote specific commercial products, services or organizations. Comments that violate our comment policy or include links to non-government organizations/web pages will not be posted.