Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Toxicology Subcommittee

Members of OSAC's Toxicology Subcommittee
Credit: A. Getz/NIST
Members of the Toxicology Subcommittee at the March 2020 OSAC Meeting in Norman, Oklahoma.

Officers Members | StandardsDiscipline-Specific Baseline Documents | Research & Development Needs | Presentations

The Toxicology Subcommittee focuses on standards and guidelines related to the analysis of biological samples for alcohol, drugs, or poisons, and the interpretation of these results.  

Officers

Melissa Kennedy, Subcommittee Chair, ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board

Marc LeBeau, Ph.D., Subcommittee Vice Chair, Federal Bureau of Investigation

Madeline Montgomery, Subcommittee Executive Secretary, Federal Bureau of Investigation

Members

Wendy Ray Adams, NMS Labs

Dan Anderson, Colorado Bureau of Investigation

Amanda M. Black, Washington State Patrol Toxicology Laboratory Division (Quality Infrastructure Representative)

Kenneth Emil Ferslew, Ph.D., East Tennessee State University

Lisa Fondren, Fondren Forensics

Madeleine J. Gates, Sam Houston State University

Marilyn Huestis, Ph.D., Institute of Emerging Health Professionals, Thomas Jefferson University

Robert Johnson, Ph.D., Tarrant County (Texas) Medical Examiner's Office

Matthew Juhascik, Ph.D., Montgomery County (Ohio) Coroner's Office

Scott J. Larson, Montana State Crime Laboratory

Laura Liddicoat, Centre of Forensic Sciences

Cedric Neumann, South Dakota State University (Statistics Representative)

Christopher Plourd, State of California (Legal Resource Representative)

Suman Rana, Ph.D., Redwood Toxicology Laboratory

Mark Ruefenacht, Self-employed

Pate Skene, Duke University (Human Resources Representative)

Rebecca Wagner, Virginia Department of Forensic Science

Ruth Ellen Winecker, Ph.D., RTI International

Dustin Tate Yeatman, Palm Beach County (Florida) Sheriff's Office Crime Laboratory

Affiliate and Task Group Participants

Toxicology Roadmap

Standards

Tier 1: On the OSAC Registry

Tier 2: Published by an SDO

Tier 3: Sent to an SDO 

  • Standard for a Quality Control Program in Forensic Toxicology Laboratories.
  • Standard for Breath Alcohol Measuring Instrument Calibration.
  • Standard for Mass Spectral Data Acceptance in Forensic Toxicology.
  • Standard for Identification Criteria in Forensic Toxicology.
  • Standard for the Analytical Scope and Sensitivity of Forensic Toxicology Testing for Medicolegal Death Investigations.
  • Standard for the Analytical Scope and Sensitivity of Forensic Toxicology Testing in Impaired Driving Investigations.
  • Standard for the Analytical Scope and Sensitivity of Forensic Toxicology Urine Testing in Drug-Facilitated Crime Investigations​​​.
  • Standard for Minimum Content Requirements of Forensic Toxicology Procedures. 
  • Standard Practices for Proficiency Testing of Forensic Toxicology Laboratories.

Tier 4: Under Development

  • Standard for Evaluating Measurement Uncertainty of Quantitative Measurements in Forensic Toxicology.
  • Standard for Breath Alcohol Instrument Specifications.
  • Guidelines for Performing Alcohol Calculations in Forensic Toxicology.
  • Guidelines for Specimen Collection and Preservation in Forensic Toxicology.

Discipline-Specific Baseline Documents

The Forensic Science Standards Board (FSSB) has provided the opportunity for OSAC Subcommittees to identify baseline documents and reference materials that best reflect the current state of the practice within their respective disciplines. 

These documents contain practical information regarding these disciplines that can help forensic scientists, judges, lawyers, researchers, other interested parties and the general public, to better understand the nature, scope, and foundations of the individual disciplines as they are currently practiced.

It is important to note that the identification of these documents in this venue does not represent an endorsement by OSAC or NIST.  Only documents that are posted on the OSAC Registries constitute OSAC endorsement. All copyrights for these documents are reserved by their owners. Subcommittee position statements or responses to data collections by the subcommittee represent the consensus opinion of the subcommittee, not necessarily the position of the entire OSAC organization or NIST.

Research & Development Needs

Presentations

  • None currently.

In general, the development of standards and guidelines is transitioning from the Scientific Working Groups (SWGs) to the OSAC. Some SWGs will continue to operate to provide other resources within their discipline. The existing SWG documents will remain in effect until updated documents are disseminated by the OSAC or the SWG. SWGDAM will retain the responsibility for updating the FBI DNA Quality Assurance Standards.

– Forensic Science Standards Board: March 2015

Created June 27, 2014, Updated September 1, 2020