Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Seized Drugs Subcommittee

Members of OSAC's Seized Drugs Subcommittee at the March 2020 OSAC Meeting.
Members of the Seized Drugs Subcommittee at the March 2020 OSAC Meeting in Norman, Oklahoma.

Officers | Members | StandardsDiscipline-Specific Baseline Documents | Research & Development Needs | Presentations

The Seized Drugs Subcommittee focuses on standards and guidelines related to the examination of evidence to identify drugs and related substances.

Officers

Agnes D. Winokur, Subcommittee Chair, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration

David Gouldthorpe, Subcommittee Vice Chair, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Anne Slaymaker, Subcommittee Executive Secretary, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration

Members

Hal Arkes, Ohio State University (Human Factors Representative)

Jason Bory, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Laboratories and Scientific Services Directorate

Brittany Bryant, American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (Quality Representative)

Deborah Cole, New Jersey Office of Forensic Science

Claire Dragovich, DuPage County Sheriff's Office

Adam Fleischer, Oregon State Police

Lynne Garcia, Texas Forensic Science Commission (Legal Representative)

Eric J. Grunwald, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension

Melissa Hehir, Georgia Bureau of Investigation

Stephanie Lambert, San Diego Police Department Crime Laboratory

Jackeline Moral, Houston Forensic Science Center

Gina Nano, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Drugs of Abuse Laboratory

Jason Nawyn, Defense Forensic Science Center (including U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory)

Cedric Neumann, South Dakota State University 

Charlene Rittenbach, North Dakota Office of Attorney General Crime Laboratory

Amanda-Kathryn B. Shanbaum, Illinois State Police

Sarah Shuda, NMS Labs

Ruth Smith, Michigan State University

Casper Venter, West Virginia University

Seized Drugs Roadmap

Standards

OSAC Registry Ribbon

Tier 1: On the OSAC Registry

 

Tier 2: Published by an SDO

  • ASTM E2329-17 Standard Practice for Identification of Seized Drugs.
  • ASTM E2548-11e1 Standard Guide for Sampling Seized Drugs for Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.
  • ASTM E1968 Standard Practice for Microcrystal Testing in Forensic Analysis for Cocaine.
  • ASTM E1969 Standard Practice for Microcrystal Testing in the Forensic Analysis of Methamphetamine and Amphetamine.
  • ASTM E2125 Standard Practice for Microcrystal Testing in the Forensic Analysis of Phencyclidine and its Analogues.
  • ASTM E2549 Standard Practice for Validation of Seized-Drug Analytical Methods.
  • ASTM E2327 Standard Practice for Quality Assurance of Laboratories Performing Seized-Drug Analysis.
  • ASTM E2882-19 Standard Guide for Analysis of Clandestine Drug Laboratory Evidence.

Tier 3: Sent to an SDO

  • Standard Practice for Education and Training of Seized Drug Analysts.
  • Standard Practice for Uncertainty Assessment in the Context of Seized-Drug Analysis.
  • Guide for Assessment of Gas Chromatography and Electron Ionization Mass Spectrometry Data During the Qualitative Analysis of Seized Drugs.
  • Standard Guide for the Development of Electron Ionization-Mass Spectral (EI-MS) Libraries.
  • Standard Guide for Intralaboratory Blind Quality Control Programs for Seized-Drug Analysis.

Tier 4: Under Development

  • Test Method for Building an Analytical Scheme for the Analysis of Synthetic Opioids in Seized Drugs.
  • Standard Guide for Assessment of Infrared Spectroscopy Data During the Qualitative Analysis of Seized Drugs.
  • Supplemental Document for the Standard Guide for Assessment of Gas Chromatography & Electron Ionization Mass Spectrometry Data.
  • Standard Guide for Reporting of Seized Drug Analysis Results.
  • Standard Guide for the Analysis of Negatives in Seized Drugs.

Discipline-Specific Baseline Documents

The Forensic Science Standards Board (FSSB) has provided the opportunity for OSAC Subcommittees to identify baseline documents and reference materials that best reflect the current state of the practice within their respective disciplines. 

These documents contain practical information regarding these disciplines that can help forensic scientists, judges, lawyers, researchers, other interested parties and the general public, to better understand the nature, scope, and foundations of the individual disciplines as they are currently practiced.

It is important to note that the identification of these documents in this venue does not represent an endorsement by OSAC or NIST.  Only documents that are posted on the OSAC Registries constitute OSAC endorsement. All copyrights for these documents are reserved by their owners. Subcommittee position statements or responses to data collections by the subcommittee represent the consensus opinion of the subcommittee, not necessarily the position of the entire OSAC organization or NIST.

*NEW* Resource Document:

Recommended Documents:

Literature:

  • Instrumental Data for Drug Analysis (IDDA), Mills, Roberson, Matchett, Simon, Burns and Ollis (3rd edition) or current edition.
  • Clarke's Analysis of Drugs and Poisons, Moffat, Osselton, Widdop and Watts (4th edition) or current edition.
  • Understanding Mass Spectra: A Basic Approach, Smith (2nd edition) or current edition.
  • Hallucinogens: A Forensic Drug Handbook, Richard Laing and Jay Siegel or current edition.
  • The Shulgin Index, Volume One: Psychedelic Phenethylamines and Related Compounds, Alexander T. Shulgin (Currently out of print).
  • Cannabis Resources
  • Pharmacophore Resources

Monographs:

Spectral Databases/Libraries:

Research & Development Needs

Presentations

  • None currently.

In general, the development of standards and guidelines is transitioning from the Scientific Working Groups (SWGs) to the OSAC. Some SWGs will continue to operate to provide other resources within their discipline. The existing SWG documents will remain in effect until updated documents are disseminated by the OSAC or the SWG. SWGDAM will retain the responsibility for updating the FBI DNA Quality Assurance Standards.

– Forensic Science Standards Board: March 2015

Created October 16, 2014, Updated May 20, 2020