NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Ruediger Kessel, Raghu N. Kacker, Klaus-Dieter Sommer
Abstract
The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty (GUM) in Measurement established a general procedure to evaluate measurement uncertainty. The Guide covers only the evaluation of a single result or a set of results. Modern measurement instruments and procedures operate over a wide range of values. Therefore in practice a calibration procedure is needed that is valid for this range. It should include an evaluation of uncertainty associated with the calibration results and for the subsequent measurements performed with the calibrated instrument. Traditionally regression is used for this purpose. In this talk we will discuss the weaknesses of the regression approach and suggest an alternative to overcome the weaknesses.
Proceedings Title
Measurement Systems and Process Improvement (MSPI) 2010
Kessel, R.
, Kacker, R.
and , K.
(2010),
Uncertainty Budgeting for Range Calibration, Measurement Systems and Process Improvement (MSPI) 2010, Teddigton, -1, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=905548
(Accessed October 11, 2025)