Skip to main content

NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.

Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Terrestrial laser scanner geometric error model parameter correlations in the Two-face, Length-consistency, and Network methods of self-calibration

Published

Author(s)

Balasubramanian Muralikrishnan, Ling Wang, Prem K. Rachakonda, Daniel S. Sawyer

Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) are increasingly used in a variety of applications where accuracies on the order of few tenths of a millimeter or smaller are routinely demanded. Self-calibration is a quick and cost-effective way to improve the accuracy of a TLS without the need for calibrated artifacts or reference instruments. In a previous work [1], we outlined three approaches to self-calibration, the Network method, the Length-consistency method, and the Two-face method. In this paper, we lay out the mathematics underlying the least-squares adjustment process for the three different techniques and also address correlation between parameters calculated from the three methods. We show that the Length-consistency and Two-face methods provide lower parameter uncertainty and fewer correlations between the calculated model parameters than the Network method.
Citation
Precision Engineering-Journal of the International Societies for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology
Volume
52
Issue
2018

Keywords

Terrestrial laser scanner, self-calibration, Network method, length-consistency method, two-face method, uncertainty, correlation, error model

Citation

Muralikrishnan, B. , Wang, L. , Rachakonda, P. and Sawyer, D. (2018), Terrestrial laser scanner geometric error model parameter correlations in the Two-face, Length-consistency, and Network methods of self-calibration, Precision Engineering-Journal of the International Societies for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=922560 (Accessed October 8, 2025)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact [email protected].

Created April 26, 2018, Updated September 12, 2018
Was this page helpful?