Skip to main content

NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.

Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Software Testing: Protocol Comparison

Published

Author(s)

James H. Yen, D L. Banks, Leonard J. Gallagher, Paul E. Black, Robert C. Hagwood, Raghu N. Kacker, Lynne S. Rosenthal

Abstract

Software testing is hard, expensive, and uncertain. Many protocols have been suggested, especially in the area of conformance verification. In order to compare the efficacy of these protocols, we have implemented a designed simulation experiment that examines performance in terms of testing costs and risks. We find that no single method dominates all others, and provide guidance on how to choose that best protocol for a given application.
Conference Dates
May 26-29, 1998
Conference Title
International Software Quality Week

Keywords

simulation, software testing, Starr's procedure, stopping rules

Citation

Yen, J. , Banks, D. , Gallagher, L. , Black, P. , Hagwood, R. , Kacker, R. and Rosenthal, L. (1998), Software Testing: Protocol Comparison, International Software Quality Week, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=151734 (Accessed October 20, 2025)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact [email protected].

Created May 29, 1998, Updated February 17, 2017
Was this page helpful?