Skip to main content

NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.

Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Segmenting Time-lapse Phase Contrast Images of Adjacent NIH 3T3 Cells

Published

Author(s)

Joe Chalfoun, Alden A. Dima, Marcin Kociolek, Michael W. Halter, Antonio Cardone, Adele P. Peskin, Peter Bajcsy, Mary C. Brady

Abstract

We present a new method for segmenting phase contrast images of NIH 3T3 fibroblast cells that is accurate even when cells are in contact. The problem of segmentation, when cells are in contact, poses a challenge to the accurate automation of cell counting, tracking and lineage modeling in cell biology. The segmentation presented in this paper consists of (1) background reconstruction to obtain noise-free foreground pixels, and (2) incorporation of biological insight about dividing and non-dividing cells into the segmentation process to achieve reliable separation of foreground pixels into pixels associated with individual cells. The segmentation results were compared against manual segmentation provided by experts for a stack of 238 images, which we consider as reference data. We chose two metrics to measure the accuracy of segmentation: the adjusted rand index (ARI) to compare similarities at a pixel level between masks resulting from manual vs. automated segmentation, and the number of cells per field (NCF) to compare the number of cells identified in the field by manual vs. automated analysis. We determined that the automated segmentation compared to manual segmentation has an average ARI of 0.96 (1 being a perfect match), with a standard deviation of 0.03, and an average difference of the two numbers of cells per field equal to 5.39% with a standard deviation of 4.6%.
Citation
Journal of Microscopy-Oxford
Volume
249
Issue
1

Keywords

3T3 segmentation, adjacent cell separation

Citation

Chalfoun, J. , Dima, A. , Kociolek, M. , Halter, M. , Cardone, A. , Peskin, A. , Bajcsy, P. and Brady, M. (2013), Segmenting Time-lapse Phase Contrast Images of Adjacent NIH 3T3 Cells, Journal of Microscopy-Oxford, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=910670 (Accessed October 8, 2025)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact [email protected].

Created January 15, 2013, Updated February 19, 2017
Was this page helpful?