Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Roles of Nanofiber Scaffold Structure and Chemistry in Directing Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Response

Published

Author(s)

Sumona Sarkar, Bryan A. Baker, Desu Chen, Patrick S. Pine, Jennifer H. McDaniel, Marc L. Salit, Wolfgang Losert, Carl G. Simon Jr., Joy P. Dunkers

Abstract

Nanofiber technology has emerged as a promising tool to recapitulate the native extracellular matrix structure; however the properties of nanofibers governing cell-material interactions are still largely undetermined. In this study we have systematically investigated the role of both nanofiber structure and chemistry in directing the response of human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs). We have developed a poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) nanofiber material system where scaffold structure is kept constant while surface chemistry is modified via mild sodium hydroxide (NaOH) hydrolysis to introduce surface carboxyl groups. Introduction of surface carboxyl groups was verified via x-ray photoelectronspectroscopy (XPS), water contact angle (WCA), and toluidine blue-O biochemical assay for carboxyl groups and scaffold structure was verified with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). hBMSCs were cultured on un-modified and NaOH-modified (Modified) scaffolds and cultures were investigated for proliferation, cell morphology, differentiation (alkaline phosphatase activity and mineralization) and microarray gene expression profiles. We found that both nanofiber structure and chemistry play a role in hBMSC osteogenic differentiation. PCL nanofiber scaffolds were able to elicit an osteogenic phenotype, while modified PCL nanofiber scaffolds did not. Scaffold structure was also found to have a more dominant effect on cell morphology and extracellular matrix gene expression than nanofiber chemistry while nanofiber chemistry had a larger effect on metabolism and cytoskeleton related gene expression.
Citation
Advances in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Volume
1
Issue
1

Keywords

Nanofiber Scaffold, Stem Cells, Surface modification, Bone tissue engineering, Microarray Gene Expression, Cell Morphology
Created August 22, 2016, Updated November 10, 2018