Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Quantitative comparison of two independent lateral force calibration techniques for the atomic force microscope

Published

Author(s)

Sarice S. Barkley, Zhao Z. Deng, Richard S. Gates, Mark Reitsma, Rachel J. Cannara

Abstract

Two independent lateral force calibration methods for the atomic force microscope, the Hammerhead (HH) technique and the diamagnetic lateral force calibrator (D-LFC), are systematically compared and found to agree to within 14 % overall uncertainty, using four different T-shaped HH reference probes. The limitations of each method are discussed and investigated. We find that stiff cantilevers may produce inaccurate D-LFC values through the application of excessively high normal loads. In addition, D-LFC results differ when comparing different modes of AFM feedback control, constant height and constant force modes, where the latter is more consistent with the HH method and closer to typical experimental conditions.
Citation
Review of Scientific Instruments
Volume
83
Issue
2

Keywords

lateral force microscopy, atomic force microscopy, force calibration, nanoscale friction

Citation

Barkley, S. , Deng, Z. , Gates, R. , Reitsma, M. and Cannara, R. (2012), Quantitative comparison of two independent lateral force calibration techniques for the atomic force microscope, Review of Scientific Instruments, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=910135 (Accessed August 13, 2022)
Created February 14, 2012, Updated October 12, 2021