NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
QCMA with One-sided Error Equals QCMA with Two-sided Error
Published
Author(s)
Stephen P. Jordan, Daniel Nagaj
Abstract
QCMA is the set of decision problems such that if the answer is yes, there exists a classical bitstring, or proof, that can be efficiently verified by a quantum computer. The verifier is allowed a small probability of rejecting a valid proof or accepting invalid proofs. We show that for all problems in QCMA, the acceptance probability for valid proofs can be boosted to one, thus QCMA with one-sided error is equal to QCMA. This is a quantum analogue to the result of Zachos and Furer, that the classical complexity class MA with one sided error is the same as MA with two-sided error. Because a quantum oracle separating QCMA and QCMA with one sided error is known, our result is a rare example of a non-relativizing proof.
Jordan, S.
and Nagaj, D.
(2011),
QCMA with One-sided Error Equals QCMA with Two-sided Error, Quantum Information & Computation, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=909926
(Accessed October 18, 2025)