Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Pro-oxidant Induced DNA Damage in Human Lymphoblastoid Cells: Homeostatic Mechanisms of Genotoxic Tolerance

Published

Author(s)

Bryant C. Nelson, Bryce J. Marquis, Anna L. Seager, Ume K. Shah, Jane M. Mikhail, Shareen H. Doak, George E. Johnson, Paul L. Carmichael, Sharon J. Scott, Andrew D. Scott, Gareth J. Jenkins

Abstract

Oxidative stress contributes to many disease aetiologies including ageing, neurodegeneration, and cancer, partly through DNA damage induction (genotoxicity). Understanding the interactions of free radicals with DNA is fundamental to discern the mutation risks posed. In genetic toxicology, regulatory authorities view most genotoxins to exhibit a linear relationship between dose and mutagenic response. Yet, homeostatic mechanisms exist, including DNA repair, which allow cells to tolerate low levels of genotoxic exposure. Acceptance of thresholds for genotoxicity has widespread consequences in terms of understanding cancer risk and regulating human exposure to chemicals/ drugs. Three pro-oxidant chemicals, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), potassium bromate (KBrO3), and menadione, were examined for low dose-response curves in human lymphoblastoid cells. DNA repair and antioxidant capacity were assessed as possible threshold mechanisms. All three chemicals exhibited thresholded responses, containing a range of non-genotoxic low doses. Levels of the DNA glycosylase OGG1 were unchanged in response to pro-oxidant stress. DNA repair focussed gene expression arrays, however, reported upregulation of BRCA1, involved in double strand break repair, in response to low dose pro-oxidant exposure. Further, the H2O2 dose response curve was shifted by modulating the antioxidant glutathione. Hence, observed pro-oxidant thresholds were due to protective capacities of DNA repair enzymes and antioxidants against DNA damage, highlighting the importance of homeostatic mechanisms in “genotoxic tolerance”.
Citation
Toxicological Sciences
Volume
128
Issue
2

Citation

Nelson, B. , Marquis, B. , Seager, A. , Shah, U. , Mikhail, J. , Doak, S. , Johnson, G. , Carmichael, P. , Scott, S. , Scott, A. and Jenkins, G. (2012), Pro-oxidant Induced DNA Damage in Human Lymphoblastoid Cells: Homeostatic Mechanisms of Genotoxic Tolerance, Toxicological Sciences, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=910757 (Accessed October 12, 2024)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact reflib@nist.gov.

Created April 26, 2012, Updated February 19, 2017