NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Nicholas Paulter, A. G. Smith, Donald R. Larson, T. M. Souders, A. G. Roddie
Abstract
A comparison of the pulse parameter values obtained from the pulse measurement services of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA and the National Physical Laboratory, UK was performed. The comparison was based on the pulse parameters of amplitude, transition duration, overshoot, and undershoot (preshoot). The parameter comparison was applied to raw (measured) waveforms, corrected waveforms (if applicable), and reconstructed waveforms. The results of the comparison show that the pulse parameter values for both national laboratories are similar and within published uncertainties.
Citation
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
measurement comparison, national measurement laboratory, NIST, NPL, overshoot, pulse amplitude
Citation
Paulter, N.
, Smith, A.
, Larson, D.
, Souders, T.
and Roddie, A.
(2004),
NIST-NPL Interlaboratory Pulse Measurement Comparison, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=33115
(Accessed November 3, 2025)