NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Measurement of Nanomaterials in Foods: Integrative Consideration of Challenges and Future Prospects
Published
Author(s)
Christopher W. Szakal, Steve Roberts, Paul Westerhoff, Andrew Bartholomaeus, Neil Buck, Ian Illuminato, Richard Canady, Michael Rogers
Abstract
Risks and benefits of nanomaterials related to food receive conflicting attention in news media, research, and across expert stakeholder groups internationally. Current nanomaterial analysis is complicated by broad definitions that include traditional food processing and additive materials, and by lack of accepted approaches to measure the exposure-relevant occurrence of suspected nanomaterials in food. As a fundamental step to improve understanding of risk and benefit, we need analytical approaches to identify what materials, new or traditional, are nanorelevant with respect to biological interaction and/or uptake during alimentary tract transit. Challenges to such approaches can include heterogeneity in nanomaterial composition and morphology, food matrix complexity, alimentary tract diversity, and analytical method limitations. Considering these and other challenges, to enable an understanding of fate to facilitate the assessment of safety or benefit, clear problem formulation is required that should result in selection of an appropriate measurement approach including sampling strategy with respect to food production/consumption and alimentary tract transit. As such, we discuss critical knowledge gaps that must be addressed so that measurement methods can better inform risk management and public policy.
Szakal, C.
, Roberts, S.
, , P.
, Bartholomaeus, A.
, Buck, N.
, Illuminato, I.
, , R.
and Rogers, M.
(2014),
Measurement of Nanomaterials in Foods: Integrative Consideration of Challenges and Future Prospects, ACS Nano
(Accessed October 20, 2025)