NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.

Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

PUBLICATIONS

Interphase Formation Versus Fluoride-ion Insertion in Tunnel-Structured Transition Metal Antimonites

Published

Author(s)

Cherno Jaye, Conan Weiland, Daniel Fischer, Alice R. Giem, Jaime R. Ayala, Sarbajit Banerjee

Abstract

Fluoridating reagents are used to model interfacial reactions in fluoride-ion batteries. Topochemical F-ion insertion is evidenced for one-dimensional (1D) tunnel-structured FeSb2O4 but interphase formation comprising antimony (oxy)fluorides is observed for MnSb2O4.
Citation
Chemical Communications
Pub Type
Journals

Keywords

F-ion batteries, energy, 1D tunnels, XRD, SEM, XANES, HAXPES
Physics, Materials, Energy and Chemistry

Citation

Jaye, C. , Weiland, C. , Fischer, D. , Giem, A. , Ayala, J. and Banerjee, S. (2024), Interphase Formation Versus Fluoride-ion Insertion in Tunnel-Structured Transition Metal Antimonites, Chemical Communications (Accessed October 6, 2025)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact [email protected].

Created November 6, 2024, Updated November 12, 2024
Was this page helpful?