Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Feasability and Performance Analysis of Automating Engineering Change Requests

Published

Author(s)

Michael Sharp, Thomas D. Hedberg Jr., William Z. Bernstein, Soonjo Kwon

Abstract

Engineering change is a non-value-added activity that happens as a product progresses through its lifecycle. Engineering change is a significant cost sink in many projects. While avoiding and mitigating the risk of change is the ideal approach, mistakes and improvements are recognized inevitably as more is learned over time about the quality of the decisions made in a product's design. This paper presents a feasibility and performance analysis of automating engineering change requests to demonstrate the promise for increasing speed, efficiency, and effectiveness of product-lifecycle wide engineering-change-request processes. In doing so, we construct a genetic algorithm and search model to discover and compare design alternatives. Finally, we demonstrate the proposed methodology by overcoming inspection issues related to the combinatorial effects of design features through a case study. Reducing the human capital involved in the engineering-change process would provide significant opportunities for saving industry both time and money in the execution of its projects.
Citation
International Journal of Production Research
Volume
59
Issue
16

Keywords

Engineering Change Request, Inspectability, Manufacturing Standards, Design-for-Inspection, Design Automation

Citation

Sharp, M. , Hedberg Jr., T. , Bernstein, W. and Kwon, S. (2021), Feasability and Performance Analysis of Automating Engineering Change Requests, International Journal of Production Research, [online], https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1893900 (Accessed April 24, 2024)
Created August 18, 2021, Updated September 29, 2022