Goldfine, A.
, Fisher, G.
and Rosenthal, L.
(1998),
Experience Report: Comparing an Automated Conformance Test Development Approach With a Traditional Development Approach, - 6114, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
(Accessed July 26, 2024)
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Experience Report: Comparing an Automated Conformance Test Development Approach With a Traditional Development Approach
Published
Author(s)
, ,
Abstract
This Interagency Report documents a recent project at NIST that investigated the effectiveness of using automated software test generation tools to help develop conformance tests for implementation of specifications of software standards. Traditionally, such conformance tests have been developed by manually coding and testing the test source code. Recently, several technologies that automate parts of the software test development process have appeared. The case study compared the use of a particular automated tool (the Assertion Definition Language (ADL), developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc.) to develop conformance tests, with the use of traditional methods, when both approaches were applied to the same standard software specifications.Citation
- 6114
Report Number
6114
Pub Type
NIST Pubs
Keywords
ADL, Assertion Definition Language, automated testing, conformance testing, software testing
Citation
Issues
If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact reflib@nist.gov.
Created April 1, 1998, Updated October 16, 2008