Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Expected net gain data of low-template DNA analyses

Published

Author(s)

Simone N. Gittelson, Carolyn R. Steffen, Michael D. Coble

Abstract

Low-template DNA analyses are affected by stochastic effects which can produce a configuration of peaks in the electropherogram (EPG) that is different from the genotype of the DNA's donor. A probabilistic and decision-theoretic model can quantify the expected net gain (ENG) of performing a DNA analysis by the difference between the expected value of information (EVOI) and the cost of performing the analysis. This article presents data on the ENG of performing DNA analyses of low-template DNA for a single amplification, two replicate amplifications, and for a second replicate amplification given the result of a first analysis. The data were obtained using amplification kits AmpFlSTR Identifiler Plus and Promega's PowerPlex 16 HS, an ABI 3130xl genetic sequencer, and Applied Biosystem's GeneMapper ID-X software. These data are supplementary to an original research article investigating whether a forensic DNA analyst should perform a single DNA analysis or two replicate analyses from a decision-theoretic point of view, entitled "Low-template DNA: a single DNA analysis or two replicates?" (Gittelson et al.,2016).
Citation
Expected net gain data of low-template DNA analyses

Keywords

Forensic science, LT-DNA, Replicates

Citation

Gittelson, S. , Steffen, C. and Coble, M. (2016), Expected net gain data of low-template DNA analyses, Expected net gain data of low-template DNA analyses, [online], https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.059 (Accessed December 11, 2024)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact reflib@nist.gov.

Created May 29, 2016, Updated November 10, 2018