NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Evaluation of Low-Contrast Detectability of Iterative Reconstruction across Multiple Institutions, CT Scanner Manufacturers, and Radiation Exposure Levels
Published
Author(s)
Adele P. Peskin, Ganesh Saiprasad, James J. Filliben, Alden A. Dima
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of Iterative Reconstruction (IR) compared with Filtered Back Projection (FBP) using low-contrast objects in phantom images across vendors and exposure levels. Materials and Methods: Randomized repeat scans of the Gammex 464 American College of Radiology (ACR) CT Accreditation Phantom (Module 2, Low-contrast) were performed for multiple radiation exposures, vendors and vendor IR algorithms. Eleven volunteers were presented with a total of 900 images using a custom designed Graphical User Interface (GUI) to perform a task created specifically for this reader study. Results were analyzed using Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) (1) statistical graphics (2) methodology. Results: Statistical analysis concluded that across all three vendors (blinded as A, B, and C) and across all exposure levels, the Correct Classification Rate (CCR) was higher for IR than FBP (p
Peskin, A.
, Saiprasad, G.
, Filliben, J.
and Dima, A.
(2015),
Evaluation of Low-Contrast Detectability of Iterative Reconstruction across Multiple Institutions, CT Scanner Manufacturers, and Radiation Exposure Levels, Radiology, [online], https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015141260
(Accessed October 20, 2025)