Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Comparison of value-assigned CRMs and PT materials: experimental design and data evaluation

Published

Author(s)

David L. Duewer, Hugo H. Gasca-Aragon, Katrice A. Lippa, Blaza Toman

Abstract

This document provides the “tedious mathematical details” for OAWG Track B Key Comparisons – that is, this document presents and discusses the statistical approaches involved in the design of Track B studies and analysis of the resulting data. This document is not required reading for an adequate appreciation of the conclusions drawn from the CCQM K79 “Comparison of value-assigned CRMs and PT materials: ethanol in aqueous matrix” and CCQM K80 “Comparison of value-assigned CRMs and PT materials: creatinine in human serum” studies. This document is a necessary adjunct to the CCQM K79 and/or –K80 reports for anyone seeking to understand and/or critique the design and analysis of these studies and it is recommended reading for anyone who wishes to propose or coordinate another OAWG Track B study.
Citation
BIPM

Keywords

CCQM (Consultative Committee on the Quantity of Matter – Chemistry), CRM (Certified Reference Material), GDR (Generalized Distance Regression), KC (Key Comparison), KCRF (Key Comparison Reference Function), OAWG (Organic Analysis Working Group)

Citation

Duewer, D. , Gasca-Aragon, H. , Lippa, K. and Toman, B. (2012), Comparison of value-assigned CRMs and PT materials: experimental design and data evaluation, BIPM, [online], www.bipm.org (Accessed May 22, 2024)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact reflib@nist.gov.

Created August 21, 2012, Updated September 28, 2020