NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Comparing modeling predictions of aluminum edge dislocations: semidiscrete variational Peierls- Nabarro versus atomistics
Published
Author(s)
Lucas M. Hale
Abstract
Multiple computational methods for modeling dislocations are implemented into a high-throughput calculation framework allowing for rigorous investigations comparing the methodologies. Focusing on aluminum edge dislocations, over twenty classical aluminum interatomic potentials are used to directly model dislocation structures using molecular dynamics, as well as provide input data for solving the semidiscrete variational Peierls-Nabarro dislocation model. The most important material parameter for determining the dislocations predicted shape is the intrinsic stacking fault energy, and both methods show similar trends across all potentials. Additionally, tests are done to vigorously determine if a recent correction to the Peierls- Nabarro model results in better agreement with the atomistic calculations.
Citation
JOM Journal of the Minerals Metals and Materials Society
Hale, L.
(2018),
Comparing modeling predictions of aluminum edge dislocations: semidiscrete variational Peierls- Nabarro versus atomistics, JOM Journal of the Minerals Metals and Materials Society, [online], https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-2836-x
(Accessed October 14, 2025)