Lucon, E.
(2021),
An assessment of different approaches for measuring crack sizes in fatigue and fracture mechanics specimens, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=933190
(Accessed April 19, 2024)
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
An assessment of different approaches for measuring crack sizes in fatigue and fracture mechanics specimens
Published
Author(s)
Abstract
Several fatigue and fracture mechanics test standards prescribe the use of fatigue precracked specimens, and measured initial and final crack sizes are required for the analyses. All these test methods utilize the X-Point Average Method, with X = 2 9, for measuring crack sizes, but another approach (the Area Average Method) is also often used for the same purpose. This investigation compared the two measurement approaches on 140 fracture toughness tests performed on various materials and specimen types, both in the ductile-to-brittle transition (Master Curve) and upper shelf (J-R tests) fracture regimes. Results obtained fully support the inclusion of the Area Average Method in all test standards requiring crack size measurements. This methodology also provides a more accurate representation of the actual crack profile, and can more effectively screen out highly irregular and invalid crack fronts.Citation
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
Pub Type
Journals
Download Paper
Keywords
Area Average Method, fatigue tests, final crack size, fracture toughness tests, initial crack size, Master Curve, J-R test, X-Point Average Method
Citation
Created October 8, 2021, Updated November 29, 2022