Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Fundamental Physics: Neutron Lifetime Measurement Using a Cold Neutron Beam


Neutron beta-decay is the process in which a neutron is transformed into a proton, electron, and electron antineutrino. This process is well described in the Standard Model (SM) of physics. Neutron decay tests the SM through increasingly precise measurements of the lifetime and its decay correlation coefficients. The reliability of the experimental values is essential for accurate tests of the model and allows an independent test of the unitarity of the CKM quark mixing matrix. In addition, the neutron lifetime currently contributes the largest uncertainty in theoretical calculations of the primordial He-4 abundance from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. It also plays a significant role in determining the detection rate of reactor neutrinos and is thus important in understanding anomalous results from those measurements.

With these motivations and the fact that there is difference between lifetime values obtain with cold neutron beams and confined ultracold neutrons, we are running another neutron lifetime measurement on the NG-C beamline focused on understanding systematic effects. A competitive beam-style experiment provides distinctly different systematics from all ultracold neutron bottle experiments. This new measurement should help to resolve the difference while improving the precision of tests of the SM.


In the beam technique, the lifetime is measured by counting the absolute number of protons within a fiducial volume while continuously monitoring the absolute neutron flux. We completed the first experiment in 2003, and the uncertainty in the result was dominated by systematic effects associated with the neutron counting. Since that time, the group has successfully refined the ability to measure absolute neutron fluence at the level of 0.06%, and with this improvement, neutron counting is no longer the limiting systematic effect. In 2013 we published an updated value of (887.7 +/- 2.2) s using the new neutron counting results. We are now working on a new iteration of the experiment to measure the lifetime with a focus on testing and accounting for possible systematic effects.

cold neutron beam illustration
Figure 1. An illustration of the method of measuring the lifetime with a cold neutron beam. The neutron flux of a cold beam is continuously monitored while protons created by neutron decay in the proton trap are confined and periodically emptied and counted. (Illustration courtesy of F. Wietfeldt)
proton trap
Figure 2. A photograph of the segmented proton trap. (Photograph by Neutron Physics Group)


NG-C beamline
Figure 3: A photograph of the neutron lifetime experiment mounted on the NG-C beamline. The beamline, magnet, high voltage cage and flux monitor can be seen. (Photograph by Neutron Physics Group)

The general approach to determining the neutron lifetime from a beam of cold neutrons is the same as that employed in the previous measurement. Figure 1 illustrates the method. A beam of cold neutrons enters a segmented proton trap (shown in Figure 2). If a neutron decays, the proton is confined by a 4.6 T magnetic field and electrostatic potentials on both ends of the trap. Periodically, the upstream electrodes (referred to as the door) are lowered, and a ramp voltage is applied to the central electrodes to eject any proton from the trap. The proton follows the magnetic field line out of the direct beam and onto a silicon detector held at a high potential to accelerate and detect the proton. While that process repeats itself, the downstream neutron flux monitor continuously monitors the neutron beam.

The lifetime experiment is currently mounted and running on the NG-C beamline, as shown in Figure 3. Apparatus upgrades and extensive offline testing has led to significantly improved apparatus stability and has opened up a much wider range of parameter space for systematics testing than was available in the previous measurement. The experiment is acquiring production data and working through many of the systematic checks. Operations and data analysis are ongoing.

Created August 14, 2015, Updated March 3, 2021