NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Observations on Differences Between the Energy Determined Using an Instrumented Striker and Dial/Encoder Energy
Published
Author(s)
M P. Manahan, R B. Stonesifer, Thomas A. Siewert, Christopher N. McCowan, D P. Vigliotti
Abstract
Instrumented stricker systems and optical encoders are widely used for measurement of absorbed energy in both conventional and miniature Charpy tests. It has been observed that the total absorbed energy measured using these two technologies, while generally in good agreement, sometimes differs by up to 20% (3 to 4.5 J) at low absorbed energies. This paper presents experimental evidence from high-speed photography of Charpy tests that the differences between dial/encoder energies and instrumented striker energies (measured with U-hammers) can largely be explained by post-fracture collisions with the striker. However, experimental and numerical studies show that vibrational energy of the pendulum and striker as well as load cell errors due to contact load distribution and inertial effects also significantly contribute to the energy differences. Experimental evidence from the literature that was originally expected to show the significance of residual vibrational energy in the test machine may show that low energy Charpy specimen behavior can be significantly affected by the design of the test machine. A simple dynamic model of a specimen and test machine system shows that a 20% increase in the stiffness of the striker and hammer assembly can lead to a 9% decrease in the energy required to fracture a low energy Charpy specimen.
Manahan, M.
, Stonesifer, R.
, Siewert, T.
, McCowan, C.
and Vigliotti, D.
(2002),
Observations on Differences Between the Energy Determined Using an Instrumented Striker and Dial/Encoder Energy, Charpy Cententary Conference | | | Elsevier, Poitiers, 1, FR, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=851234
(Accessed October 11, 2025)