Skip to main content

NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.

Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Flux Loss Measurements of Ag- Sheathed Bi-2223 Tapes

Published

Author(s)

Mi-Hye Jang, Winnie K. Wong-Ng, Robert D. Shull, Lawrence P. Cook, DeaSik Suh

Abstract

Alternating current (AC) losses of two Bi-2223 ([Bi, Pb] : Sr : Ca : Cu :O = 2:2:2:3) tapes [one untwisted (Tape I, twist-pitch of mm) and the other with a twist-pitch of 8mm (Tape II)] were measured and compared. These samples, produced by the powder-in-tube (PIT) method, are multi-filamentary and have an Ag/Au and Ag matrix, respectively. Susceptibility measurements were conducted while cooling in a magnetic field. Flux loss measurements were conducted as a function of ramping rate, frequency and field direction. The AC flux loss increases as the twist-pitch of the tapes decreased, in agreement with the Norris Equation.
Citation
Ceramic Transactions
Volume
149

Keywords

(Ag/Au and Ag mztrix), AC loss measurements, Bi-2223 superconductor tapes, different twist pitch, powder-in-tube methods

Citation

Jang, M. , Wong-Ng, W. , Shull, R. , Cook, L. and Suh, D. (2004), Flux Loss Measurements of Ag- Sheathed Bi-2223 Tapes, Ceramic Transactions (Accessed October 15, 2025)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact [email protected].

Created January 1, 2004, Updated February 19, 2017
Was this page helpful?