NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Richard D. Peacock, Paul A. Reneke, Glenn P. Forney, M. M. Kostreva
Abstract
Several methods of evaluation of the predictive capability have been applied to fire models, but with limited utility. These range from explicit evaluation of the equations used in simple models such as ASET to pointwise evaluation of complex models from numerous computer runs of a model. This paper presents a discussion of the issues involved in conducting an analysis of a complex room fire model. Examples using currently available room fire models are presented. For the models and test cases examined, heat release rate and heat transfer effects dominate the behavior of the models. For simple models like the ASET model, analytical techniques can be readily applied. For more complex fire models, obtaining an overall assessment of the model increases in complexity with the complexity of the model, requiring evaluation of numerous model inputs and outputs. Thus, more directed local investigations are currently the only tractable means of evaluation. Areas for additional research are identified.
Peacock, R.
, Reneke, P.
, Forney, G.
and Kostreva, M.
(1998),
Issues in Evaluation of Complex Fire Models, Fire Safety Journal, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=913063
(Accessed October 5, 2025)