NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Comparison of Human and Computer Performance Across Face Recognition Experiments
Published
Author(s)
P J. Phillips, Alice J. O'Toole
Abstract
Since 2005, human and machine performance has been systematically compared as part of face recognition competitions, with results being been reported for both still and video imagery. The key results from these competitions are reviewed. To analysis performance across studies, the cross-modal performance analysis (CMPA) framework is introduced. The CMPA framework is applied to experiment that were part of face recognition competition. The analyze shows that for matching frontal faces in still images, algorithms are consistently superior to humans. For video and difficult still face-pairs, humans are superior. Finally, based on the CMPA framework and a face performance index, we outline a challenge problem for developing algorithms that are superior to humans for the general face recognition problem.
Phillips, P.
and O'Toole, A.
(2014),
Comparison of Human and Computer Performance Across Face Recognition Experiments, Image and Vision Computing, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=913011
(Accessed October 2, 2025)