NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Assessing Conformity of Two Laboratories: Formulations as a Statistical Hypothesis Testing Problem
Published
Author(s)
Andrew L. Rukhin
Abstract
A decision problem frequently occurring in metrology is that of compatibility of data obtained by two (or several) different laboratories, methods or instruments. Several statistical approaches to this conformity assessment problem are reviewed including the classical "equality of means" hypotheses tests. A new compliance hypothesis is formulated when one laboratory is a prestigious national metrology institute whose data may be given as a certified reference material (CRM) interval for the measurand (or a gold standard). The Kullback--Leibler information number is suggested as a directional (asymmetric) interchangeability index.
Rukhin, A.
(2013),
Assessing Conformity of Two Laboratories: Formulations as a Statistical Hypothesis Testing Problem, Metrologia, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=911963
(Accessed October 8, 2025)