Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Experimental Evaluation of AI-Driven Protein Design Risks Using Safe Biological Proxies

Published

Author(s)

Svetlana Ikonomova, Bruce Wittmann, Fernanda Piorino Macruz de Oliveira, David Ross, Samuel Schaffter, Olga Vasilyeva, Elizabeth Strychalski, Eric Horvitz, James Diggans, Sheng Lin-Gibson, Geoffrey Taghon

Abstract

Advances in machine learning are providing new abilities for engineering biology, promising leaps forward with beneficial applications. At the same time, these advances raise concerns about biosecurity. Recently, Wittmann et al. described an in silico pipeline of generative AI tools to demonstrate how amino acid sequences encoding sequences of concern (SOCs) could be reformulated as synthetic homologs that may evade detection by biosecurity screening software (BSS) used by nucleic acid synthesis providers. While the discovered vulnerability has been mitigated, its true severity remains unclear, as the study was performed without experimental testing of the synthetic homologs. Here, we present a testing, evaluation, validation, and verification (TEVV) framework for AI-assisted protein design (AIPD), using safe proteins as SOC proxies. Our findings indicate AIPD can generate synthetic homologs whose predicted structures are similar to a native template, but without necessarily retaining activity. We determine that current AIPD systems are not yet powerful enough to reliably rewrite the sequence of a given protein, while both maintaining activity and evading detection by BSS. We further conclude that TEVV of generated sequences requires significant investment of time, technical skill, and resources. We offer our framework and test proteins as a general benchmark of AIPD capability.
Citation
Science

Keywords

artificial intelligence, biosecurity, biosafety, protein engineering, validation

Citation

Ikonomova, S. , Wittmann, B. , Piorino Macruz de Oliveira, F. , Ross, D. , Schaffter, S. , Vasilyeva, O. , Strychalski, E. , Horvitz, E. , Diggans, J. , Lin-Gibson, S. and Taghon, G. (2025), Experimental Evaluation of AI-Driven Protein Design Risks Using Safe Biological Proxies, Science (Accessed June 23, 2025)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact [email protected].

Created June 20, 2025
Was this page helpful?