NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
The SI brochure's treatment of quantities that it regards as dimensionless, with the associated unit one, requires certain physical quantities to be regarded as simply numbers. The resulting formal system erases the nature of these quantities and excludes them from important benefits that quantity calculus provides over numerical value calculations, namely, that accidental confusion of different units and different kinds of quantities is sometimes prevented. I propose a better treatment that entails removing from the SI brochure those prescriptions that conflict with common practices in the treatment of dimensionless quantities, especially the definition and use of non-SI dimensionless units that are distinguished by kind.
Flater, D.
(2024),
Letter to the editor: Unit one is intrusive, Metrologia, [online], https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ad4bea, https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=957439
(Accessed October 14, 2025)