NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Demand flexibility evaluation for building energy systems with active thermal storage using model predictive control
Published
Author(s)
Guowen Li, Yangyang Fu, Amanda Pertzborn, Zheng O'Neill, Jin Wen
Abstract
Model Predictive Control (MPC) has been demonstrated to be an efficient way to reduce building operating costs, especially for buildings with thermal storage systems, by changing the power demand profiles. Different parameter settings of MPC have also been shown to have significant influence on building power usage, which may therefore influence building demand flexibility. In this study, we estimate how MPC parameters such as the prediction horizon (PH) can influence building demand flexibility. A virtual high-fidelity building testbed was created in Modelica based on actual measurement data from a chiller plant with an ice storage tank system. Then the virtual system was randomly perturbed to generate training data for the MPC models. The MPC was formulated as a nonlinear programming problem and solved using a global optimization solver. We found that MPC can reduce operating costs by 15.8 % and reduce the peak power demand by 9.6 % compared with rule-based storage-priority control. The building demand flexibility initially increases as the PH increases and then reaches its plateau when the PH is longer than 20-hours. Comparison of the building demand flexibility will provide insights into choosing the suitable MPC formulation for a grid-interactive efficient building.
Li, G.
, Fu, Y.
, Pertzborn, A.
, O'Neill, Z.
and Wen, J.
(2022),
Demand flexibility evaluation for building energy systems with active thermal storage using model predictive control, ASHRAE Transactions, Toronto, CA, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=933865
(Accessed October 10, 2025)