NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
X-ray CT imaging and finite element computations of the elastic properties of a rigid organic foam compared to experimental measurements: Implications for foam grade differences and process control
Published
Author(s)
Edward Garboczi, Aaron Forster, Jan Miller, Chen-Luh Lin, Cesar Chan, Kumar Natesaiyer, David Song, Suman Sinha-Ray
Abstract
A combined computational/experimental materials science technique was developed for acquiring the structure of a rigid organic foam (ROHACELL) using X-ray computed tomography with appropriate image analysis, computing the elastic moduli using large-scale finite element computations in combination with a new technique, and validating the results with compressive measurements of both Young's modulus and compressive yield strength. Within experimental error, and the limited knowledge existing of the backbone material comprising the foam, good agreement was obtained between imaging/finite element computations and experimental mechanical measurements. Using the new combined experimental/theoretical procedures, it was found that the backbone solid Young's modulus differed by more than a factor of 100 % between two different grades of ROHACELL foam, in accord with the findings of other researchers. It was also found that within a given grade, on the foam samples tested, the backbone modulus for one density foam was smaller by more than 100 % than the other density foams, due to either process or material feedstock variability. Density measurements also gave insight into the variability between different thicknesses and grades of foam.
Garboczi, E.
, Forster, A.
, Miller, J.
, Lin, C.
, Chan, C.
, Natesaiyer, K.
, Song, D.
and Sinha-Ray, S.
(2015),
X-ray CT imaging and finite element computations of the elastic properties of a rigid organic foam compared to experimental measurements: Implications for foam grade differences and process control, Journal of Materials Science, [online], https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8958-4, https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=917238
(Accessed October 8, 2025)