Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Viscoelastic Characterization of Polymers Using Instrumented Indentation II. Dynamic Testing



Christopher C. White, Mark R. VanLandingham, P L. Drzal, N-K Chang, S-H Chang


Dynamic nanoindentation was preformed on a cured epoxy, poly(methyl methacrylate), and poly(dimethyl siloxane) or PDMS. These samples, two glassy polymers and a rubbery material are used to illustrate the agreement between classical rheological instrumentation and dynamic nanoindentation. Excellent agreement between bulk rheological data and the dynamic nanoidentation data for the two glassy materials and more divergent results for the rubbery PDMS was observed. Also discussed is the theoretical foundation and historical development of the working equations for these two types of instrumentation. The major difference between nanoindentation and the more classical rheological instrumentation is in the instrument-sample interface.
Journal of Materials Research


dynamics, instrumentation, nanoindenter, polymer, theortical development, working equations


White, C. , VanLandingham, M. , Drzal, P. , Chang, N. and Chang, S. (2005), Viscoelastic Characterization of Polymers Using Instrumented Indentation II. Dynamic Testing, Journal of Materials Research (Accessed May 30, 2024)


If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact

Created July 13, 2005, Updated June 2, 2021