Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Simulated stress mitigation strategies in embedded 3D bioprinting

Published

Author(s)

Leanne Friedrich, Ross Gunther, Jonathan Seppala

Abstract

Extrusion-based 3D bioprinting is a powerful tool for fabricating complex cell-laden constructs. Embedded Ink Writing (EIW) is an extrusion-based printing technique wherein a nozzle embedded into a support bath writes continuous filaments. Because it allows for low-viscosity inks, EIW is particularly useful for bioprinting. One of the largest challenges in extrusion-based bioprinting is limiting damage that cells experience inside of the nozzle. Longer shear stress durations and higher shear stress magnitudes lead to more damage. Shape fidelity is also critical for bioprinting. Filaments in EIW can exhibit defects like sharp edges and large aspect ratios, which can lead to porosity, surface roughness, and poor mechanical properties in the final part. We use numerical computational fluid dynamics simulations in OpenFOAM to evaluate whether common shear stress mitigation techniques improve cell viability without causing shape defects. Critically, we find that using a conical nozzle, increasing the nozzle diameter, decreasing the print speed, and decreasing the ink viscosity can improve the viability of magnitude-sensitive cells, but using a conical nozzle, increasing the nozzle length, and decreasing the print speed can increase damage in duration-sensitive cells. Additionally, using a conical nozzle or a larger nozzle can lead to larger shape defects in printed filaments. Material selection and printing parameter selection in embedded 3D bioprinting should take into account allowable shape defects, allowable cell damage, and cell type.
Citation
Physics of Fluids
Volume
34

Keywords

3D-printing, bioprinting, extrusion, Herschel-Bulkley, OpenFOAM, simulation

Citation

Friedrich, L. , Gunther, R. and Seppala, J. (2022), Simulated stress mitigation strategies in embedded 3D bioprinting, Physics of Fluids, [online], https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0102573, https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=934898 (Accessed June 23, 2024)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact reflib@nist.gov.

Created August 30, 2022, Updated November 29, 2022