NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Signatures of intracrystallite and intercrystallite limitations of charge transport in polythiophenes
Published
Author(s)
Kiarash Vakhshouri, Brandon Smith, Edwin Chan, Chenchen Wang, Alberto Salleo, Cheng Wang, Alexander Hexemer, Enrique Gomez
Abstract
Charge carrier mobilities in conjugated semicrystalline polymers depend on morphological parameters such as crystallinity, crystal orientation, and connectivity between ordered regions. Despite recent progress in the development of conducting polymers, the complex interplay between the aforementioned parameters and their impact on charge transport is not fully understood. By varying the casting solvents and thermal annealing, we have systematically modulated the crystallization of poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT) and poly[2,5-bis(3- hexadecylthiophen-2-yl)thieno(3,2-b)thiophene] (PBTTT) thin films to examine the role of microstructure on charge mobilities. In particular, we achieve equal crystallinities through 1 different processing routes to examine the role of structural parameters beyond the crystallinity on charge mobilities. As expected, a universal relationship does not exist between the crystallinity in both P3HT and PBTTT active layers and the charge mobility in devices. In P3HT films, higher boiling point solvents yield longer conjugation lengths, an indicator of stronger intracrystalline order, and therefore higher device mobilities. In contrast, the charge mobilities of PBTTT devices depend on the interconnectivity between crystallites in the active layer and intercrystalline order.
Vakhshouri, K.
, Smith, B.
, Chan, E.
, Wang, C.
, Salleo, A.
, Wang, C.
, Hexemer, A.
and Gomez, E.
(2016),
Signatures of intracrystallite and intercrystallite limitations of charge transport in polythiophenes, Macromolecules, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=920744
(Accessed October 12, 2025)